Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual
Simon J Craddock Lee1,2, Caitlin C Murphy1,2, David E Gerber1,2,3
1Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Background:
Accrual to cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. Few data exist regarding whether financial reimbursement might increase accruals.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to assess perceptions about reimbursement to overcome barriers to trial accrual.
Research Design:
This was a cross-sectional survey.
Subjects:
Oncologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile.
Measures:
We report descriptive statistics, associations of physician characteristics with perceptions of reimbursement, domains, and subthemes of free-text comments.
Results:
Respondents (n=1030) were mostly medical oncologists (59.4%), ages 35-54 (67%), and male (75%). Overall, 30% reported discussing trials with >25% of patients. Barriers perceived were administrative/regulatory, physician/staff time, and eligibility criteria. National Cancer Institute cooperative group participants and practice owners were more likely to endorse higher reimbursement. Respondents indicated targeted reimbursement would help improve infrastructure, but also noted potential ethical problems with reimbursement for discussion (40.7%) and accrual (85.9%). Free-text comments addressed reimbursement sources, recipients, and concerns about the real and apparent conflict of interest.
Conclusions:
Though concerns about a potential conflict of interest remain paramount and must be addressed in any new system of reimbursement, oncologists believe reimbursement to enhance infrastructure could help overcome barriers to trial accrual.
Insights
Financial reimbursement could improve cancer clinical trial accrual by enhancing infrastructure. However, oncologists express significant concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest, necessitating careful consideration in any new reimbursement system.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Healthcare Economics
Background:
- Cancer clinical trial accrual rates are suboptimal.
- Limited data exist on the impact of financial reimbursement on trial accrual.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess oncologists' perceptions of reimbursement as a strategy to overcome barriers to clinical trial accrual.
- To identify specific barriers to trial enrollment and how reimbursement might address them.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional survey was conducted among oncologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile.
- Descriptive statistics and analyses of physician characteristics associated with perceptions of reimbursement were performed.
Main Results:
- Most respondents were medical oncologists; 30% discussed trials with over 25% of patients.
- Perceived barriers included administrative/regulatory issues, physician/staff time, and eligibility criteria.
- While oncologists believe reimbursement could improve infrastructure, significant ethical concerns about conflicts of interest were noted for both discussion and accrual reimbursement.
Conclusions:
- Oncologists support reimbursement for enhancing clinical trial infrastructure to overcome accrual barriers.
- Addressing ethical concerns, particularly potential conflicts of interest, is paramount for implementing any reimbursement system.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients