Differences in rural and urban drivers' attitudes and beliefs about seat belts

In the United States, a disproportionate number of motor vehicle crash fatalities occur in rural areas. While many factors likely contribute to the discrepancy between fatality rates in rural and urban areas, prior studies suggest that rural drivers may be more likely to engage in risky driving behaviors like seat belt non-use. Although having favorable attitudes or beliefs about seat belts increases the likelihood of wearing them, few studies have investigated the possibility that lower rates of seat belt use in rural areas may result from a greater prevalence of unfavorable seat belt attitudes and beliefs-one part of a distinct rural "traffic safety culture." In the current study, we analyzed responses from the 2016 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey (MVOSS) to test the hypotheses that rural drivers are more likely than urban drivers to hold unfavorable attitudes and beliefs about seat belts, and that these unfavorable attitudes and beliefs predict lower self-reported seat belt use. We found that rural and urban drivers differed significantly on several seat belt attitudes and beliefs and that these differences persisted after controlling for possible demographic differences between rural and urban drivers. We also found that drivers who hold less favorable attitudes and beliefs were less likely to always wear their seat belts. However, even after accounting for demographic factors and differences in attitudes and beliefs, rural drivers continued to be less likely to report full-time seat belt use than urban drivers. Our findings suggest that rural drivers should be treated as a distinct market segment for seat belt messaging and public awareness campaigns, and that interventions designed to change the unfavorable attitudes and beliefs about seat belts held by rural drivers may help reduce the disparity between rural and urban traffic fatality rates.