Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
Edimar Alcides Bocchi1, Henrique Turin Moreira2, Juliana Sanajotti Nakamuta3
1Nucleo de Insuficiencia Cardiaca, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Insights
Public heart failure (HF) disease management programs (DMPs) in Brazil offer more services than private ones, including multidisciplinary care and patient education. However, adherence to treatment remains a significant challenge in HF care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) disease management programs (DMPs) are crucial for patient care.
- Understanding the components influencing HF-DMP effectiveness in Brazil is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of HF-DMP components on care and clinical decision-making in Brazil.
- To compare public versus private HF-DMPs and multidisciplinary (MHF) versus non-multidisciplinary (non-MHF) approaches.
Main Methods:
- An observational, cross-sectional study surveyed 98 cardiologists across Brazil.
- The survey included 29 questions on demographics, infrastructure, HF patient data, clinical management, performance indicators, and treatment perceptions.
Main Results:
- Public HF-DMPs showed significantly more dedicated services, multidisciplinary teams, educational programs, written discharge instructions, rehabilitation, monitoring, and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT-HF) use compared to private ones.
- Multidisciplinary HF-DMPs were associated with enhanced educational initiatives, written instructions, rehabilitation, and monitoring.
- Physicians adjusted medications based on hospitalizations or symptom worsening; treatment adherence was a major challenge.
Conclusions:
- HF-DMPs exhibit significant heterogeneity in Brazil.
- Future HF care strategies must incorporate insights from this study regarding clinical decision-making processes to enhance patient outcomes.
Objectives:
This observational, cross-sectional study based aimed to test whether heart failure (HF)-disease management program (DMP) components are influencing care and clinical decision-making in Brazil.
Methods:
The survey respondents were cardiologists recommended by experts in the field and invited to participate in the survey via printed form or email. The survey consisted of 29 questions addressing site demographics, public versus private infrastructure, HF baseline data of patients, clinical management of HF, performance indicators, and perceptions about HF treatment.
Results:
Data were obtained from 98 centers (58% public and 42% private practice) distributed across Brazil. Public HF-DMPs compared to private HF-DMP were associated with a higher percentage of HF-DMP-dedicated services (79% vs 24%; OR: 12, 95% CI: 94-34), multidisciplinary HF (MHF)-DMP [84% vs 65%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-8), HF educational programs (49% vs 18%; OR: 4; 95% CI: 1-2), written instructions before hospital discharge (83% vs 76%; OR: 1; 95% CI: 0-5), rehabilitation (69% vs 39%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), monitoring (44% vs 29%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-5), guideline-directed medical therapy-HF use (94% vs 85%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15), and less B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) dosage (73% vs 88%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), and key performance indicators (37% vs 60%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-7). In comparison to non- MHF-DMP, MHF-DMP was associated with more educational initiatives (42% vs 6%; OR: 12; 95% CI: 1-97), written instructions (83% vs 68%; OR: 2: 95% CI: 1-7), rehabilitation (69% vs 17%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 3-44), monitoring (47% vs 6%; OR: 14; 95% CI: 2-115), GDMT-HF (92% vs 83%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15). In addition, there were less use of BNP as a biomarker (70% vs 84%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-8) and key performance indicators (35% vs 51%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 91,6) in the non-MHF group. Physicians considered changing or introducing new medications mostly when patients were hospitalized or when observing worsening disease and/or symptoms. Adherence to drug treatment and non-drug treatment factors were the greatest medical problems associated with HF treatment.
Conclusion:
HF-DMPs are highly heterogeneous. New strategies for HF care should consider the present study highlights and clinical decision-making processes to improve HF patient care.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care