Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

253
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
253
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

90
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
90
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.7K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.7K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

363
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
363
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

403
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
403

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase III Probability of Success When Early Development Is Based on a Putative Surrogate Endpoint: A Vaccine Efficacy Case Study.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Vaccine efficacy estimands and power considerations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Maximizing impact: the power of early HPV vaccination for long-term protection-lessons from a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Application of Causal Inference to Establish Assay Effect in the Absence of a Bridging Study: A Case Study of MenACWY-CRM Conjugate Vaccine Data.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Using Random Center-Effect.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same author

Adopting the estimand framework in prophylactic vaccine trials.

Vaccine·2025
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Inference under covariate-adaptive randomization: A simulation study.

Andrea Callegaro1, B S Harsha Shree2, Naveen Karkada1

  • 1GSK Vaccines, Rue de l'Institut 89, Rixesart, Belgium.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|January 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Re-randomization tests are recommended for covariate-adaptive randomization in clinical trials. They maintain power and control Type I error, unlike asymptotic tests, especially when models are misspecified.

Keywords:
Covariate adaptive randomizationinferenceminimizationmodel misspecificationre-randomization teststype I error

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

398

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

398

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Covariate-adaptive randomization designs aim to balance treatment arms based on key covariates.
  • Debate exists on whether conventional asymptotic tests or re-randomization tests are appropriate with these designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of asymptotic and re-randomization tests under covariate-adaptive randomization using simulation.
  • To evaluate Type I error control and statistical power for different testing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation study comparing asymptotic and re-randomization tests.
  • Analysis of Type I error rates and power under correct and misspecified models.
  • Inclusion of minimization and permuted blocks randomization methods.

Main Results:

  • Asymptotic tests do not adequately control Type I error when the statistical model is misspecified.
  • Re-randomization tests demonstrate comparable power to asymptotic tests under correct models.
  • Re-randomization tests show increased power when adjusting for covariates and are more robust to model misspecification.

Conclusions:

  • Re-randomization tests are a reliable choice for covariate-adaptive randomization, offering robust Type I error control and good power.
  • Minimization and permuted blocks randomization yield similar outcomes in this context.
  • The findings support the use of re-randomization tests for improved validity in adaptive clinical trial designs.