Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of physiologic instruments.

A G Gift1, K L Soeken

  • 1University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore 21201.

Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care
|March 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptation to parenthood: Differing expectations of social supports for mothers versus fathers.

The journal of primary prevention·2013
Same author

Herbal medicines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Mental health services for youths in foster care and disabled youths.

American journal of public health·2001
Same author

Pain experiences of traumatically injured patients in a critical care setting.

American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses·2001
Same author

Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill trauma patients.

AACN clinical issues·2001
Same author

Social support transactions between professional and nonprofessional women and their mothers.

Research in nursing & health·2000
Same journal

Diagnosing heart failure through imaging.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Comparative utility of median household income, social vulnerability index, and social deprivation index in predicting heart failure-related emergency department revisits: A multi-hospital cohort study.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Predicting in-hospital mortality in AECOPD: A comparison of the mSOFA score with DECAF, Ottawa, and GOLD classifications.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and biomarkers for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A systematic review.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Associations of genetic risk factors and air pollution with incident pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Impaired hemostasis in mechanical circulatory support systems: Monitoring with T-TAS® 01, in vitro correction with VWF concentrates, and impact of membrane oxygenators.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
See all related articles

This study highlights the critical need for rigorous reliability and validity assessments of physiologic instruments in nursing research. Understanding measurement error sources is essential for accurate clinical data collection and interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research
  • Biomedical Measurement
  • Clinical Instrumentation

Background:

  • Psychometric evaluation is standard for psychological instruments in nursing research.
  • Physiologic and clinical instruments often lack the same rigorous evaluation.
  • This gap can impact the quality of research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss reliability and validity issues specific to physiologic measures in nursing research.
  • To clarify common terms used in evaluating physiologic instruments.
  • To identify sources of measurement error in clinical research settings.

Main Methods:

  • Review of measurement concepts relevant to physiologic instruments.
  • Explanation of terms like accuracy, precision, and sensitivity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and categorization of potential measurement errors.

    • Main Results:

    • Parallels are drawn between traditional psychometric terms and physiologic measurement terms.
    • Sources of error include environmental, user, machine, subject, and interpretation factors.
    • Examples from cardiopulmonary nursing research illustrate these concepts.

    Conclusions:

    • Emphasizes the importance of evaluating the reliability and validity of all research instruments, including physiologic ones.
    • Promotes a systematic approach to understanding and minimizing measurement error in clinical nursing studies.
    • Aims to improve the quality and trustworthiness of research utilizing physiologic data.