Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Validation of Administrative Codes for Palliative Care Consultation Among Critically Ill Children
Siobhán O'Keefe1, Angela S Czaja2
1Department of Paediatric Critical Care, Children's Health Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; and.
Insights
Palliative care (PC) administrative codes for critically ill children show high accuracy (specificity) but frequently miss actual PC cases (low sensitivity). Researchers should consider this underascertainment in future studies using administrative data.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Accurate identification of palliative care (PC) utilization is crucial for resource allocation and quality improvement in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- Administrative codes are often used to track healthcare services, but their validity in specific patient populations requires careful evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of administrative codes (V66.7 and Z51.5) for identifying palliative care consultations in critically ill children.
- To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of these codes against a local PC registry.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed hospitalizations with PICU admission from March 2016 to March 2018.
- Palliative care administrative codes were compared against a gold standard local PC registry.
- Key performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.
Main Results:
- The study included 4670 hospitalizations; 3.9% had documented PC consultations.
- Palliative care administrative codes demonstrated high specificity (99.8%) but low sensitivity (11%).
- Positive predictive value was 66.7% and negative predictive value was 96.5%.
Conclusions:
- Current administrative codes for palliative care in critically ill children are highly specific but have poor sensitivity, indicating significant underascertainment.
- Future research utilizing administrative data should account for the limitations in capturing PC utilization in this population.
Objectives:
To determine the validity of palliative care (PC) administrative codes (V66.7 and Z51.5) among critically ill pediatric patients.
Methods:
In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we included all hospitalizations with a PICU admission between March 2016 and March 2018. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the relevant codes were estimated by using a gold standard of a local PC registry.
Results:
During the study period, 4670 hospitalizations were included. The median admission age was 5 years (interquartile range 1.5-12.9) with 55% having at least 1 complex chronic condition. The median length of PICU stay was 1.8 days (interquartile range 1-3.4) and mortality was low (1.3%). A total 182 (3.9%) hospitalizations had evidence of a PC consultation. Administrative codes for PC had a sensitivity of 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8%-16.5%) and a specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%). The positive and negative predictive values were 66.7% (95% CI 47.2%-82.7%) and 96.5% (95% CI 95.9%-97.0%), respectively.
Conclusions:
Among critically ill children, PC administrative codes had high specificity but poor sensitivity. The potential for underascertainment of this resource should be considered in future research using administrative data.
More Related Videos
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Continuing Care
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.