Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Assessing the Reliability of Relevant Tweets and Validation Using Manual and Automatic Approaches for Flood Risk
Xiaohui Liu1, Bandana Kar2, Francisco Alejandro Montiel Ishino1
1National Institute on Minority and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Abstract:
While Twitter has been touted as a preeminent source of up-to-date information on hazard events, the reliability of tweets is still a concern. Our previous publication extracted relevant tweets containing information about the 2013 Colorado flood event and its impacts. Using the relevant tweets, this research further examined the reliability (accuracy and trueness) of the tweets by examining the text and image content and comparing them to other publicly available data sources. Both manual identification of text information and automated (Google Cloud Vision, application programming interface (API)) extraction of images were implemented to balance accurate information verification and efficient processing time. The results showed that both the text and images contained useful information about damaged/flooded roads/streets. This information will help emergency response coordination efforts and informed allocation of resources when enough tweets contain geocoordinates or location/venue names. This research will identify reliable crowdsourced risk information to facilitate near real-time emergency response through better use of crowdsourced risk communication platforms.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:

