Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comodulation masking release for multicomponent signals.

J W Hall1, J H Grose, M P Haggard

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill 27514.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strangulated Hernia.

Iowa medical journal·2023
Same author

Ports' criticality in international trade and global supply-chains.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

The effects of diet and sex in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Revue neurologique·2020
Same author

A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets.

Nature communications·2019
Same author

Proficiency Testing in a Laboratory Accreditation Program for the Bacterial Ring Rot Pathogen of Potato.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

A systems-based assessment of Palestine's current and future infrastructure requirements.

Journal of environmental management·2019
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Comodulation masking release (CMR) was studied using pure-tone signals in noise. Maximum release occurred with single tones and specific masker configurations, supporting an envelope subtraction model.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing in hearing

Background:

  • Comodulation masking release (CMR) is a phenomenon where masking is reduced when noise bands are comodulated.
  • Understanding CMR mechanisms is crucial for explaining auditory scene analysis and sound segregation.
  • Previous models have focused on envelope patterns and correlations, but their efficacy for complex signals is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of signal complexity and masker structure on comodulation masking release.
  • To test the validity of "dip listening" and across-frequency stimulus differences in explaining CMR.
  • To evaluate a proposed model of CMR based on across-frequency envelope subtraction.

Main Methods:

  • Pure-tone signals (one, two, or three components) were detected in masking noises (one, two, or three narrow bands).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Maskers were either comodulated or noncomodulated.
  • Comodulation masking release (CMR) was measured under various signal and masker conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • CMR was greatest for single pure-tone signals and specific masker configurations (three bands, lower flanking band).
    • Significant CMR was observed even for two- and three-component signals in corresponding maskers.
    • Results did not support "dip listening" or models based solely on envelope pattern/correlation differences.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that comodulation masking release is influenced by signal complexity and masker structure.
    • A model where across-frequency envelope differences are coded by subtraction provides a better account of the results.
    • This supports a more nuanced understanding of auditory processing and sound segregation mechanisms.