Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.1K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

253.7K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
253.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

63.2K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
63.2K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

84.7K
Scientific Laws
84.7K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.8K
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

784
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
784

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Quillien: Intuitive preferences and interpretive humility in intentionality judgments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

'So Help Me God'? Does oath swearing in courtroom scenarios impact trial outcomes?

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2023
Same author

Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against "Anticipating Divine Protection" in Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Kupor, Laurin, and Levav (2015).

Psychological science·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.0K

Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory.

Will M Gervais1

  • 1Centre for Culture and Evolution, Department of Psychology, Brunel University London.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|January 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Psychological science reform needs better theory. This article reviews interdisciplinary theories to help design a healthier scientific ecosystem, moving beyond current issues like unreplicable results and fraud.

Keywords:
cultural evolutiondiversity and inclusionmetasciencemethods reformmodelingnormsphilosophy of sciencetheory

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

572
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.0K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

572
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Science
  • Metascience
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Cultural Evolution

Background:

  • The psychological sciences face challenges including unreplicable results, statistical anomalies, and fraud.
  • Reform and metascience movements are emerging to address these issues.
  • There is a need for robust theoretical frameworks to guide these changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify areas within psychological science reform and metascience that would benefit from theoretical integration.
  • To review existing theoretical frameworks relevant to scientific discovery and network structures.
  • To explore how philosophy of science and cultural evolution theories can inform the redesign of the scientific ecosystem.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established frameworks modeling scientific discovery.
  • Analysis of ideal scientific network structures.
  • Examination of theories on the evolution of norms and institutions.
  • Focus on interdisciplinary theoretical models from philosophy of science and cultural evolution.

Main Results:

  • Current scientific ecosystem in psychology is described as "toxic" due to emergent problematic norms and institutions.
  • Existing interdisciplinary theories offer potential for intelligently designing a more robust and reliable scientific system.
  • Theoretical models can guide the evolution of scientific practices and networks.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating theoretical frameworks is crucial for effective reform in psychological science.
  • Interdisciplinary theories from philosophy of science and cultural evolution provide valuable tools for improving scientific practices.
  • A theoretically informed approach can help create a healthier and more productive scientific ecosystem.