One-Year COMBO Stent Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: from the COMBO Collaboration
Jaya Chandrasekhar1,2, Vera C de Winter2, Deborah N Kalkman2
1The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
Insights
The COMBO stent showed a higher risk of target lesion failure in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients compared to non-ACS patients. However, no significant differences in stent thrombosis or target lesion failure were found among ACS subtypes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials
Background:
- The COMBO stent utilizes biodegradable polymer and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture technology for enhanced endothelialization.
- This technology may offer benefits in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the COMBO stent in patients with ACS compared to non-ACS patients.
- To analyze COMBO stent outcomes based on ACS subtypes: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA).
Main Methods:
- A pooled patient-level dataset (n=3614) from the MASCOT and REMEDEE registries was analyzed.
- Outcomes were assessed by ACS status and subtype, with a primary endpoint of 1-year target lesion failure (TLF).
- Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis (ST).
Main Results:
- ACS patients (54%) had a higher risk of 1-year TLF compared to non-ACS patients (4.5% vs. 3.3%, HR 1.51, p=0.045).
- Definite/probable stent thrombosis was not significantly different between ACS and non-ACS groups (1.1% vs. 0.5%, p=0.08).
- 1-year TLF was similar across ACS subtypes (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA), but definite/probable ST was higher in STEMI patients (1.9%, p=0.03).
Conclusions:
- The COMBO stent PCI was associated with a slightly increased risk of 1-year TLF in ACS patients versus non-ACS patients.
- No significant differences in stent thrombosis were observed between these groups.
- 1-year TLF rates were comparable among STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA patients.
Purpose:
The COMBO biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent includes endothelial progenitor cell capture (EPC) technology for rapid endothelialization, which may offer advantage in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to analyze the performance of the COMBO stent by ACS status and ACS subtype.
Methods:
The COMBO collaboration (n = 3614) is a patient-level pooled dataset from the MASCOT and REMEDEE registries. We evaluated outcomes by ACS status, and ACS subtype in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) versus unstable angina (UA). The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis (ST).
Results:
We compared 1965 (54%) ACS and 1649 (46.0%) non-ACS patients. ACS presentations included 40% (n = 789) STEMI, 31% (n = 600) NSTEMI, and 29% (n = 576) UA patients. Risk of 1-year TLF was greater in ACS patients (4.5% vs. 3.3%, HR 1.51 95% CI 1.01-2.25, p = 0.045) without significant differences in definite/probable ST (1.1% vs 0.5%, HR 2.40, 95% CI 0.91-6.31, p = 0.08). One-year TLF was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA (4.8% vs 4.8% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.60), but definite/probable ST was higher in STEMI patients (1.9% vs 0.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). Adjusted outcomes were not different in MI versus UA patients.
Conclusions:
Despite the novel EPC capture technology, COMBO stent PCI was associated with somewhat greater risk of 1-year TLF in ACS than in non-ACS patients, without significant differences in stent thrombosis. No differences were observed in 1-year TLF among ACS subtypes.
More Related Videos
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
