Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Three-Dimensional Bone Extracellular Matrix Model for Osteosarcoma
Published on: April 12, 2019
Osteosarcoma, personalized medicine, and tissue engineering; an overview of overlapping fields of research
1Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Introduction:
Osteosarcoma is a common bone malignancy in patients of all ages. Surgical and chemotherapy interventions fail to shrink tumor growth and metastasis. The development of efficient patient-specific therapeutic strategies for osteosarcoma is of great interest in tissue engineering and personalized medicine. The present manuscript aimed to review the advancements in tissue engineering and personalized medicine strategies to overcome osteosarcoma and the relevant biological aspects as well as the current tumor models in vitro and in vivo.
Results:
Tissue engineering and personalized medicine contribute to gene/cell engineering and cell-based therapies specific to genomic and proteomic profiles of individual patients to improve the current treatment options. Also, tissue engineering scaffolds provide physical support to missing bones, could trap cancer cells and deliver immune cells. Taken together, these strategies suppress tumor growth, angiogenic potential, and the subsequent metastasis as well as elicit desirable immune responses against tumor mass.
Discussion:
Advanced and high-throughput gene and protein identification technologies have facilitated the recognition of genomic and proteomic profiles of patients to design and develop patient-specific treatments. The pre-clinical studies showed promising outcomes to inhibit tumor growth and invasion but controversial results compared to clinical investigations make the importance of more clinical reports inevitable. The experimental tumor models assist the evolution of effective treatments by understanding the mechanisms of tumor progression.
Conclusion:
Tissue engineering and personalized medicine strategies seem encouraging alternatives to conventional therapies against osteosarcoma. Modeling the tumor microenvironment coupled with pre-clinical results give new intelligence into the translation of strategies into the clinic.
Insights
Tissue engineering and personalized medicine offer promising new strategies for treating osteosarcoma, a common bone cancer. These approaches aim to create patient-specific therapies to improve outcomes where traditional treatments fail.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Osteosarcoma is a prevalent bone malignancy with limited treatment efficacy.
- Current surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions often fail to control tumor growth and metastasis.
- There is a critical need for innovative, patient-specific therapeutic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review advancements in tissue engineering and personalized medicine for osteosarcoma treatment.
- To discuss relevant biological aspects and current in vitro/in vivo tumor models.
- To explore strategies for overcoming osteosarcoma challenges.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on tissue engineering and personalized medicine in osteosarcoma.
- Analysis of gene/cell engineering and cell-based therapies.
- Evaluation of tissue engineering scaffolds for bone support and cancer cell targeting.
- Examination of high-throughput gene and protein identification technologies.
- Assessment of pre-clinical and clinical study outcomes.
- Review of experimental tumor models for understanding progression.
Main Results:
- Tissue engineering scaffolds can support bone structure, trap cancer cells, and deliver immune cells.
- Personalized medicine utilizes genomic and proteomic profiles for tailored treatments.
- Combined strategies show potential in suppressing tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis.
- Pre-clinical studies demonstrate promising tumor inhibition, but clinical data is more varied.
- Experimental models aid in understanding tumor progression mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- Tissue engineering and personalized medicine represent encouraging alternatives to conventional osteosarcoma therapies.
- Modeling the tumor microenvironment is crucial for translating these strategies into clinical practice.
- Further clinical validation is necessary to confirm the efficacy of these advanced approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

