Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Force-velocity profiling in athletes: Reliability and agreement across methods.
Kolbjørn Lindberg1,2, Paul Solberg2, Thomas Bjørnsen1,2
1Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Assessing lower limb force-velocity profiles in athletes showed poor reliability for vertical jumps. Leg press offered better reliability for force-velocity variables, suggesting adjustments for accurate assessment.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Analysis
Background:
- Accurate assessment of individual force-velocity (FV) profiles is crucial for optimizing athletic performance.
- Previous research has explored various methods for FV profile assessment, but reliability and agreement across methods remain areas of concern.
- Understanding the test-retest reliability and inter-method agreement is essential for practical application in training and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the test-retest reliability and agreement between different measurement methods for individual lower limb force-velocity profiles in athletes.
- To compare the reliability of FV profile assessment across different exercises (squat jump, countermovement jump, leg press) and measurement techniques.
- To identify the most reliable FV variables and methods for practical use in sports science and coaching.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study involving 27-82 male and female athletes tested twice before and after a 2-6 month training period.
- Individual FV profiles were determined using incremental loading protocols in squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and leg press exercises.
- Force and velocity were measured using force plates, linear encoders, and flight time calculations, with linear regression used to extrapolate FV variables (F0, V0, Pmax, SFV).
Main Results:
- The slope of the FV profile (SFV) demonstrated poor reliability across all vertical jumping methods (CV: 14-30%, ICC: 0.36-0.79).
- The leg press exercise showed acceptable reliability for FV variables (CV: 3.7-8.3%, ICC: 0.82-0.98).
- Agreement across methods for F0 and Pmax was moderate to strong (Pearson r: 0.56-0.95), while agreement for V0 and SFV was weaker (r: -0.39-0.78).
Conclusions:
- The reliability of force-velocity variables derived from vertical jumping is poor, particularly for SFV and V0, irrespective of the measurement method.
- Leg press provides a more reliable method for assessing force-velocity characteristics compared to vertical jumps.
- Coaches and researchers should exercise caution when interpreting FV variables from vertical jumps and consider the limitations of different measurement techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Average and Instantaneous Velocity Vectors

