Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
"No weight for height" case detection strategies for therapeutic feeding programs: sensitivity to acute malnutrition
Benjamin Guesdon1, Alexia Couture2, Elise Lesieur3
1Action Contre La Faim - France, 14-16 Boulevard Douaumont, 75854, Paris, France. bguesdon@actioncontrelafaim.org.
Insights
New criteria for therapeutic feeding programs (TFPs) increase detection of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) but admit many non-malnourished children. This approach may strain resources without effectively targeting all SAM cases.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Global Health
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Therapeutic Feeding Programs (TFPs) are crucial for treating childhood malnutrition.
- Current eligibility criteria are being re-evaluated with new proposed methods.
- The study compares a new MUAC+SWAZ approach with existing WHO guidelines and the Expanded MUAC approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the MUAC+SWAZ criteria on TFP eligibility.
- To compare the sensitivity and specificity of MUAC+SWAZ and Expanded MUAC for detecting wasted children.
- To assess the demographic changes in children eligible for TFPs under different criteria.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 558 population-representative cross-sectional cluster surveys (since 2007).
- Identification of children classified as severe acute malnutrition (SAM), moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), and wasted with stunting (WA+ST).
- Calculation of proportions of previously eligible children excluded and non-malnourished children newly eligible under different criteria.
Main Results:
- Both MUAC+SWAZ and Expanded MUAC increase sensitivity for detecting SAM compared to MUAC < 115mm and edema alone.
- Increased sensitivity comes at the cost of specificity, potentially leading to a large increase in TFP size.
- MUAC+SWAZ shows high sensitivity for wasted and stunted children (over 80%), but about half of additional children identified are not SAM or wasted and stunted.
Conclusions:
- The MUAC+SWAZ approach may inflate TFP targets by including many non-acutely malnourished children.
- Resource scarcity necessitates a critical review of abandoning Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) and adopting alternative case detection strategies.
- Current strategies may not be the most efficient use of limited resources for malnutrition treatment.
Background:
One newly proposed approach to determining eligibility of children aged 6-59 months for therapeutic feeding programs (TFPs) is to use mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 115 mm, bilateral oedema or Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ) < - 3 as admission criteria (MUAC+SWAZ). We explored potential consequences of this approach on the eligibility for treatment, as compared with the existing WHO normative guidance. We also compared sensitivity and specificity parameters of this approach for detecting wasted children to the previously described "Expanded MUAC" approach.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 558 population representative cross-sectional cluster surveys conducted since 2007. We retrieved all children classified as severe acute malnutrition (SAM), moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), and those who are both wasted and stunted (WA + ST), and calculated proportions of previously eligible children who would now be excluded from treatment, as well as proportions of non-malnourished children among those who would become eligible. We also analyzed the expected changes in the number and demographics (sex, age) of the selected populations of children according to the different admission approaches.
Results:
Both MUAC+SWAZ and Expanded MUAC case detection approaches substantially increase the sensitivity in detecting SAM, as compared to an approach which restricts detection of SAM cases to MUAC< 115 mm and oedema. Improved sensitivity however is attained at the expense of specificity and would require a very large increase of the size of TFPs, while still missing a non-negligible proportion (20-25%) of the SAM caseload. While our results confirm the sensitivity of the MUAC+SWAZ case detection approach in detecting WA + ST (over 80%), they show, on the other hand, that about half of the additional target detected by using SWAZ criterion will be neither SAM nor WA + ST.
Conclusions:
These results suggest that recently promoted approaches to case detection inflate TFPs' targets through the allocation of treatment to large numbers of children who have not been shown to require this type of support, including a significant proportion of non-acutely malnourished children in the MUAC+SWAZ approach. Considering the scarcity of resources for the implementation of TFPs, the rationale of abandoning the use of WHZ and of these alternative case detection strategies need to be critically reviewed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

