Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

221
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
221
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

88
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
88
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

375
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
375
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

60.6K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
60.6K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.3K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parental body mass index and offspring childhood body size and eating behaviour: A structural equation modelling analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluating confounding in rare variant genome wide association studies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Do antidepressants change our interpretations of facial emotions?

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Is cam morphology a cause of osteoarthritis?

Nature reviews. Rheumatology·2026
Same author

Structured tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: an updated systematic review.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

African-specific genetic loci determine iron status and risk of severe malaria and bacteremia in African children.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Applying Bayesian Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation to Prioritise Candidate Causal Traits From High-Dimensional Data: Illustration From Estimation of the Effect of Maternal Metabolites on Offspring Birthweight.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Individualized Bayesian Inference Identifies Novel Genetic Variants for Parkinson's Disease.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

DRIVE v3: Command Line Application for Identity-by-Descent Haplotype Clustering in Large Biobank Scale Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Translating Cancer Dependency Maps From Cell Lines to Breast Cancer Tumor Genomics.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Polygenic Risk Scores for Incident Dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Outcome and Exposure Polygenic Risk Scores Can Help Reduce Information Bias and Selection Bias in Regression Estimates From Biobank Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Mendelian randomisation with coarsened exposures.

Matthew J Tudball1,2, Jack Bowden1,2,3, Rachael A Hughes1,2

  • 1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Genetic Epidemiology
|February 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization studies can be biased when exposure is a simplified measure of a continuous trait. This research introduces a new method to correct for this bias, improving effect size interpretation in genetic epidemiology.

Keywords:
Mendelian randomisation analysisbiomarkerslatent variable modellingsensitivity analysis

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) relies on the exclusion restriction assumption, where genetic variants influence outcomes solely through the exposure.
  • In practice, exposures are often coarsened approximations of latent continuous traits, potentially violating this assumption.
  • Genetically driven outcome variations within exposure categories can lead to biased MR estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework for understanding and quantifying bias caused by coarsened exposure measurements in MR.
  • To develop a method for estimating the effect of standard deviation increases in latent exposures.
  • To provide a sensitivity analysis for MR studies with potential violation of the exclusion restriction assumption.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of a bias expression for MR with coarsened exposure data.
  • Development of a method using a sensitivity parameter, interpretable as latent exposure's genetic variance.
  • Application of the method in both one-sample and two-sample MR settings.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework clarifies the violation of the exclusion restriction assumption due to coarsened exposures.
  • Bias derived may inflate or deflate effect estimates but does not reverse their direction.
  • The novel method allows for estimation of effects on a continuous latent exposure scale.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method provides a robust approach to address bias from coarsened exposure in MR.
  • This framework enhances the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes in genetic epidemiology.
  • Applied examples and reanalyses demonstrate the practical utility and validity of the method.