Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

The Clinical Application of Tumor Treating Fields Therapy in Glioblastoma
Published on: April 16, 2019
Updating Reports of Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Cancer
Elena Elimova1, Stephanie Moignard1, Xuan Li2
1Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Importance:
Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are usually reported after a predetermined number of events (death or disease progression) have occurred, when survival curves remain poorly defined. Updated reports are important in providing mature data.
Objectives:
To evaluate the proportion of phase 3 RCTs for cancer that are updated and the factors that are associated with updating them and, for updated trials, to compare initial and updated results.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This study identified reports of 2-group RCTs with a sample size of at least 100, published in 6 major journals between 1990 and 2010, that evaluated drug treatments for breast, lung, or prostate cancer. PubMed and abstracts of large cancer conferences were searched to identify updated (or earlier) reports of the same trials published up to 2019. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the provision of updated reports. The hazard ratios defining the relative treatment effects for the primary and secondary end points between the initial and updated reports were compared.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Proportion of RCTs whose results are updated, factors associated with updating, and change in hazard ratio for the primary end point between initial and updated reports.
Results:
A total of 207 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 41 (20%) were found to have updated reports. The factors significantly associated with an update included positive trial results (odds ratio [OR], 8.7 [95% CI, 3.3-23.3]), larger trial size (OR, 1.0006 [95% CI, 1.0000-1.0012]), evaluation of hormonal agents (OR, 5.8 [95% CI, 1.6-21.8]) or targeted agents (OR, 4.3 [95% CI, 1.3-14.6]) compared with chemotherapy, and evaluation of adjuvant therapy rather than therapy for advanced disease (OR, 8.0 [95% CI, 2.9-21.9]). For 31 trials for which initial and updated hazard ratios for the primary end point were available, the median hazard ratio increased from 0.66 (95% CI, 0.22-1.20) to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.32-1.19) (P < .001), indicating a decreased level of effectiveness.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Only 20% of reports of phase 3 clinical trials for breast, lung, and prostate cancer were updated. Original reports of such trials are based on relatively few events, and their results are immature; more mature data indicate a decreased level of effect in updated trials. Updated reporting to provide mature, long-term results of clinical trials should be mandated.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

