Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

60.9K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
60.9K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.0K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.0K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.7K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.2K
3.2K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Mutations in Microorganisms01:18

Mutations in Microorganisms

267
Mutations are heritable changes in an organism’s genome involving alterations in the base sequence of DNA or RNA. These changes can influence cellular processes and phenotypic traits, potentially transforming the unaltered wild type into a mutant form. Such changes, termed forward mutations, are pivotal in shaping the genetic diversity of organisms.RNA viruses exhibit the highest mutation rates due to the absence of robust proofreading mechanisms during genome replication. In contrast,...
267

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A hybrid differential evolution based on gaining‑sharing knowledge algorithm and harris hawks optimization.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Self-adaptive dual-strategy differential evolution algorithm.

PloS one·2019
Same author

An Ultrastable Matryoshka [Hf<sub>13</sub> ] Nanocluster as a Luminescent Sensor for Concentrated Alkali and Acid.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2019
Same author

Sealing the Intramedullary Femoral Canal for Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The journal of knee surgery·2019
Same author

Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI.

European radiology·2019
Same author

Solvent-assisted coordination driven assembly of a supramolecular architecture featuring two types of connectivity from discrete nanocages.

Chemical science·2019
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

30.9K

Ranking-based hierarchical random mutation in differential evolution.

Xuxu Zhong1, Meijun Duan2, Peng Cheng3

  • 1National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Plos One
|February 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel ranking-based hierarchical random mutation in differential evolution (RHRMDE) algorithm. RHRMDE enhances performance by applying different mutation strategies to distinct population groups, improving both exploration and convergence.

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

30.9K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

24.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Intelligence
  • Optimization Algorithms
  • Evolutionary Computation

Background:

  • Differential evolution (DE) is a widely used optimization algorithm.
  • Existing DE variants face challenges in balancing global exploration and local exploitation.
  • Improving DE performance requires novel mutation strategies and parameter adaptation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel algorithm, ranking-based hierarchical random mutation in differential evolution (RHRMDE), to enhance DE performance.
  • To introduce a hierarchical mutation mechanism that differentiates strategies for non-inferior and inferior groups.
  • To develop an adaptive control parameter strategy considering problem and individual differences.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a hierarchical random mutation mechanism applying "DE/rand/1" and its variant.
  • Assigned "DE/rand/1" with global characteristics to the non-inferior group for exploration.
  • Utilized an improved "DE/rand/1" with elite characteristics for the inferior group to enhance exploitation.
  • Incorporated adaptive control parameter tuning based on problem and individual differences.

Main Results:

  • The RHRMDE algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared to five DE variants.
  • RHRMDE outperformed five non-DE algorithms on 32 universal benchmark functions.
  • The hierarchical mutation strategy effectively balanced global exploration and local exploitation.

Conclusions:

  • RHRMDE significantly improves the performance of differential evolution algorithms.
  • The proposed hierarchical mutation and adaptive parameter control are effective enhancements.
  • RHRMDE offers a robust and efficient approach for complex optimization problems.