Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

09:03
The Perinatal Asphyxiated Lamb Model: A Model for Newborn Resuscitation
Published on: August 15, 2018
11.1K
Stillbirth: are we making more progress than we think? A retrospective cohort study
R J Selvaratnam1,2, D L Rolnik1, M-A Davey1,2
1The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|February 4, 2021
Summary
Population stillbirth rates are declining faster than previously understood. Changes in maternal demographics have led to an underestimation of these reductions, masking the true impact of interventions.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Reproductive health research
- Public health surveillance
Background:
- Stillbirth rates are a key indicator of perinatal health.
- Maternal demographics have significantly shifted over recent decades.
- Understanding these shifts is crucial for accurate interpretation of stillbirth trends.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the impact of evolving maternal risk profiles on stillbirth rate interpretation.
- To assess how changes in maternal characteristics influence the observed stillbirth rate.
- To determine if population stillbirth reductions have been underestimated due to demographic changes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective population-based cohort study (1983-2018) of 2,419,923 births in Victoria, Australia.
- Analysis of changes in maternal characteristics over time.
- Development of a multivariable logistic regression model for stillbirth based on early data, applied prospectively to assess demographic impact.
Main Results:
- Despite a more complex maternal risk profile in 2014-2018 (older mothers, increased nulliparity, indigenous status, multiple pregnancies, pre-existing diabetes), the stillbirth rate decreased from 5.42 to 1.72 per 1000 births.
- Without accounting for demographic shifts, the stillbirth rate would have paradoxically increased by 12% (from 4.94 to 5.54 per 1000) between 1983 and 2018.
- Population reductions in stillbirth have been underestimated due to these demographic changes.
Conclusions:
- Population stillbirth rates are declining more rapidly than appreciated.
- The changing maternal demographic profile has masked the true extent of stillbirth reduction.
- Accurate interpretation of stillbirth rates requires accounting for evolving maternal characteristics.

