Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025
09:42
Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images
Published on: September 7, 2017
10.0K
Keys to Class II correction: A comparison of 2 extraction protocols
Sarah M George1, Phillip M Campbell2, Larry P Tadlock2
1Private practice, Monroe, La.
Summary
Extracting mandibular second premolars improves Class II correction by retracting incisors and protracting molars. This extraction pattern enhances molar movement without affecting the mandibular plane angle or vertical dimension.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Craniofacial Growth and Development
- Dental Surgery
Background:
- Class II Division 1 malocclusion is a common orthodontic concern.
- Treatment often involves premolar extractions to manage dental crowding and skeletal discrepancies.
- Optimizing extraction patterns is crucial for effective orthodontic outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of two distinct premolar extraction patterns on incisor and molar movements.
- To evaluate the influence of extraction timing on Class II Division 1 treatment.
- To assess the impact on mandibular plane angle and vertical dimension.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 54 growing patients (10-17 years) with Class II Division 1 malocclusion was analyzed.
- Patients were treated using Tweed directional force mechanics with either first premolar (4/4) or first maxillary/second mandibular premolar (4/5) extractions.
- Lateral cephalograms and dental casts were used to quantify tooth movements and skeletal changes via superimpositions.
Main Results:
- Mandibular first premolar extractions resulted in significantly greater mandibular incisor retraction (1.6 mm) compared to second premolar extractions.
- Mandibular first molars showed significantly more mesial protraction (0.7 mm) with the 4/5 extraction pattern.
- No significant differences were observed in mandibular plane angle changes or vertical molar eruption between the two extraction groups.
Conclusions:
- Extraction of mandibular second premolars (4/5 pattern) is advantageous for Class II molar correction, facilitating greater mesial molar movement and less incisor retraction.
- Neither extraction pattern significantly impacts the mandibular plane angle or vertical dimension, refuting the 'wedge effect'.
- The findings provide valuable insights for orthodontists in selecting optimal extraction strategies for Class II Division 1 patients.
Related Concept Videos
00:56Extraction: Advanced Methods
789
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
789
01:18Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
478
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
478
01:24DNA Isolation
43.6K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
43.6K