Related Experiment Videos
Interposition graft fistulas for hemodialysis
B Hylander1, A Fernström, J Swedenborg
1Department of Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Summary
For hemodialysis vascular access, interposition arteriovenous (AV) fistulas using synthetic grafts are a second choice. Loop grafts showed better outcomes than straight grafts, reducing reoperation needs.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Radiocephalic arteriovenous (AV) fistulas are the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis.
- When radiocephalic AV fistulas are not feasible, interposition AV fistulas using synthetic grafts serve as an alternative.
- Synthetic grafts, including polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and bovine grafts, are utilized for interposition AV fistulas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the experience with interposition AV fistulas using synthetic grafts.
- To evaluate the patency rates and complications associated with interposition graft fistulas.
- To determine the need for additional surgery in patients with interposition graft fistulas.
Main Methods:
- A review of 49 interposition grafts (41 patients) placed in the forearm.
- Grafts included 40 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and nine bovine grafts.
- Grafts were placed either as straight conduits or as loops connecting arterial and venous vessels.
Main Results:
- At a mean follow-up of 13 months, nine grafts remained in use and nine failed.
- Reoperation was required in 30 instances due to complications, successfully resuming dialysis in 25 cases.
- Reoperation was significantly more common in straight grafts compared to loop grafts (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Interposition AV fistulas using synthetic grafts are a viable second-line option for hemodialysis vascular access.
- Loop configuration of interposition grafts is associated with better outcomes and fewer complications than straight configurations.
- PTFE loop graft fistulas are recommended as the second choice for angioaccess after radiocephalic fistulas.