Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025
Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Identification of Latent Classes of Motor Performance in a Heterogenous Population of Adults
Allison S Hyngstrom1, Chi C Cho2, Reivian Berrios Barillas3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Objective:
To determine classes of motor performance based on community deployable motor impairment and functional tests in a heterogeneous adult population.
Design:
Sixteen tests of limb-specific and whole-body measures of motor impairment and function were obtained. Linear regression analysis was used to dichotomize performance on each test as falling within or outside the age- and sex-predicted values. Latent class analysis was used to determine 3 classes of motor performance. The chi-square test of association and the Fisher exact test were used for categorical variables, and analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for continuous variables to evaluate the relationship between demographic characteristics and latent classes.
Setting:
General community.
Participants:
Individuals (N=118; 50 men) participated in the study. Quota sampling was used to recruit individuals who self-identified as healthy (n=44) or currently living with a preexisting chronic health condition, including arthritis (n=19), multiple sclerosis (n=18), Parkinson disease (n=17), stroke (n=18), or low functioning (n=2).
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure:
Latent classes of motor performance.
Results:
Across the entire sample, 3 latent classes of motor performance were determined that clustered individuals with motor performance falling: (1) within predicted values on most of the tests (expected class), (2) outside predicted values on some of the tests (moderate class), and (3) outside predicted values on most of the tests (severe class).The ability to distinguish between the respective classes based on the percent chance of falling outside predicted values was achieved using the following community deployable motor performance tests: 10-meter walk test (22%, 80%, and 100%), 6-minute walk test (14.5%, 37.5%, and 100%), grooved pegboard test (23%, 38%, and 100%), and modified physical performance test (3%, 54%, and 96%).
Conclusions:
In this heterogeneous group of adults, we found 3 distinct classes of motor performance, with the sample clustering into an expected test score group, a moderate test score deficiency group, and a severed test score deficiency group. Based on the motor performance tests, we established that community deployable, easily administered testing could accurately predict the established clusters of motor performance.
