Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Rebooting atrial fibrillation ablation in the COVID-19 pandemic
Chirag R Barbhaiya1, Lalit Wadhwani2, Arun Manmadhan2
1Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, NY, 10016, New York, USA. chirag.barbhaiya@nyulangone.org.
Insights
Safe resumption of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was achieved during the COVID-19 pandemic. New protocols reduced healthcare utilization and maintained patient safety, demonstrating feasibility for complex electrophysiology procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) was significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic due to resource conservation and exposure concerns.
- Limited data exists on the peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the pandemic.
- Protocols were developed to safely restart AF ablation while minimizing healthcare resource use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the acute and subacute outcomes of AF ablation performed under newly implemented COVID-19 protocols.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of restarting complex electrophysiology procedures during the pandemic.
- To determine the impact of new protocols on healthcare resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- A comparative analysis of patients undergoing AF ablation in 2020 (n=111) under COVID-19 protocols versus 2019 (n=200).
- Implementation of new practices: pre-procedure COVID-19 testing, selective transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), venous closure, and same-day discharge.
- Analysis of perioperative healthcare utilization and acute procedural outcomes.
Main Results:
- One out of 111 patients tested positive for COVID-19 pre-ablation; no ablation-related transmission or major complications occurred in either cohort.
- Significantly fewer patients in the 2020 cohort received pre-procedure TEE (68.4%) compared to the 2019 cohort (97.5%), despite a higher prevalence of persistent arrhythmia.
- Same-day discharge was achieved in 68% of the 2020 cohort versus 0% in the 2019 cohort.
Conclusions:
- The study demonstrates the feasibility of safely resuming complex electrophysiology procedures, such as AF ablation, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Instituted protocols effectively reduced healthcare utilization while maintaining the quality of care.
- These protocols may be adaptable to other procedures and healthcare settings.
Purpose:
Catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) were significantly curtailed during the peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to conserve healthcare resources and limit exposure. There is little data regarding peri-procedural outcomes of medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We enacted protocols to safely reboot AF ablation while limiting healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate acute and subacute outcomes of protocols instituted for reboot of AF ablation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods:
Perioperative healthcare utilization and acute procedural outcomes were analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation under COVID-19 protocols (2020 cohort; n=111) and compared to those of patients who underwent AF ablation during the same time period in 2019 (2019 cohort; n=200). Newly implemented practices included preoperative COVID-19 testing, selective transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), utilization of venous closure, and same-day discharge when clinically appropriate.
Results:
Pre-ablation COVID-19 testing was positive in 1 of 111 patients. There were 0 cases ablation-related COVID-19 transmission and 0 major complications in either cohort. Pre-procedure TEE was performed in significantly fewer 2020 cohort patients compared to the 2019 cohort patients (68.4% vs. 97.5%, p <0.001, respectively) despite greater prevalence of persistent arrhythmia in the 2020 cohort. Same-day discharge was achieved in 68% of patients in the 2020 cohort, compared to 0% of patients in the 2019 cohort.
Conclusions:
Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of safe resumption of complex electrophysiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing healthcare utilization and maintaining quality of care. Protocols instituted may be generalizable to other types of procedures and settings.
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

