Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Biocontained Carcass Composting for Control of Infectious Disease Outbreak in Livestock
Published on: May 6, 2010
Compacted Anthropogenic Materials as Backfill for Buried Pipes.
Andrzej Głuchowski1,2, Raimondas Šadzevičius2, Rytis Skominas2
1SGGW Water Centre, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02787 Warsaw, Poland.
Anthropogenic materials (AM) can substitute natural aggregates in buried pipe backfill, but their soil reaction modulus (E) is generally lower. Careful selection and treatment are needed for effective use of recycled concrete aggregate, crushed brick, recycled asphalt pavement, fly ash, and bottom slag.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Civil Engineering Materials Science
Background:
- Buried pipe structural performance depends on backfill material properties and compaction.
- Pipe-soil interaction is crucial for buried pipe integrity.
- Backfill strength is characterized by modulus of soil reaction (E') and constrained modulus (E).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the constrained modulus (E) of five types of anthropogenic materials (AM) using oedometric tests.
- To compare the performance of AM with natural aggregates (NA) for buried pipe backfill applications.
- To determine the suitability of AM as a substitute for NA.
Main Methods:
- Conducted extensive oedometric tests on five AM types: recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), crushed brick (CB), recycled asphalt pavement (RAP), fly ash and bottom slag mix (FA + BS), and blast furnace slag (BFS).
- Measured the constrained modulus (E) for each AM.
- Compared the measured E values with those of natural aggregates (NA) with similar gradations.
Main Results:
- Anthropogenic materials exhibited different behavior compared to natural aggregates.
- Generally, AM showed lower constrained modulus (E) values than NA for the same gradation.
- Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and blast furnace slag (BFS) showed potential for direct substitution.
- Crushed brick (CB) may require special treatment.
- Recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and fly ash + bottom slag (FA + BS) may require extra compaction efforts.
Conclusions:
- Anthropogenic materials can be viable alternatives to natural aggregates in buried pipe backfill, but their mechanical properties differ.
- Specific AM, like RCA and BFS, can be used directly as substitutes for NA.
- Other AM, such as CB, RAP, and FA + BS, require specific treatments or enhanced compaction to achieve desired performance.
- Understanding the constrained modulus (E) of AM is critical for effective buried pipe design and ensuring adequate pipe-soil interaction.
Related Concept Videos
Preplaced Aggregate Concrete
Placing Concrete
While placing concrete, care is taken to ensure that the concrete is laid in uniform layers, and hand shoveling and moving concrete using poker vibrators is avoided. Also,...
Compacting Factor test
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
Pumped Concrete
For direct-acting pumps, the concrete enters the pump via the inlet valve under the action of gravity and suction created by the movement of the piston. This concrete is then forced into the pipeline and out through the outlet valve by the forward movement...
Masonry Paving
Multiple Pipe Systems
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...

