Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
Composite adverse outcomes in obstetric studies: a systematic review
Dylan Herman1,2,3, Kar Yee Lor4, Abdul Qadree5
1Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Composite outcomes in obstetric trials are common but often lack consistency. Future research should use methods like concept mapping to improve the development of these critical outcome measures.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Reproductive Health Research
Background:
- Composite outcomes are increasingly utilized in obstetric randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- A critical appraisal of their use in obstetric RCTs is needed to identify limitations and propose solutions.
- This systematic review focuses on the application and development of composite outcomes in pregnancy research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise the use of composite outcomes in obstetric RCTs.
- To identify limitations in the current construction and application of composite outcomes.
- To provide potential solutions for future research in developing better composite outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1999 and 2019.
- Searches conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Databases, and clinicaltrials.gov using pregnancy and composite outcome terms.
- Duplicate screening and data extraction followed by descriptive synthesis and critical appraisal.
Main Results:
- 156 RCTs reporting 181 composite outcomes were included, primarily related to maternal and perinatal morbidity/mortality.
- Composite outcomes varied widely, including 2 to 16 components often dissimilar in severity, frequency, and relevance.
- Many composite outcomes failed to incorporate patient perspectives, holistic health views, or consider both mother and fetus.
Conclusions:
- Composite outcomes are increasingly used for conclusions and recommendations in obstetric RCTs.
- Significant inconsistencies exist in component selection and measurement of composite adverse obstetric outcomes.
- Novel methods like concept mapping may improve the development of composite adverse obstetric outcomes for future studies.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Teratogenicity