Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Comparison of Two Methods for Implementing Comfort Care Order Sets in the Inpatient Setting: a Cluster Randomized
F Amos Bailey1,2,3, Beverly R Williams4,5, Patricia S Goode4,5
1Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. Amos.bailey@cuanschutz.edu.
Comparing two palliative care education methods, this study found no significant differences in improving end-of-life care quality. Both teleconference and in-person training effectively equipped palliative care teams.
Area of Science:
- Palliative Care
- Medical Education
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- There is a critical need to enhance end-of-life care quality for inpatients.
- Palliative Care Consultation Teams (PCCTs) play a vital role in delivering specialized end-of-life care.
- Optimizing the implementation of palliative care interventions is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of two distinct implementation strategies for a Comfort Care Education Intervention.
- To evaluate the impact of teleconference versus in-person training on PCCTs' ability to deliver palliative care education.
- To assess the influence of implementation method on key quality indicators of end-of-life care.
Main Methods:
- A cluster randomized implementation trial was conducted across Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).
- Palliative Care Consultation Teams (PCCTs) were assigned to either teleconference or in-person 'train-the-champion' workshops.
- Outcomes included various process-of-care endpoints related to end-of-life care, analyzed using generalized estimating equations.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed between the teleconference and in-person training groups for any primary or secondary process-of-care endpoints.
- Pre- and post-implementation analyses also revealed no significant changes in key quality indicators.
- Potential limitations include high baseline values for certain endpoints, possibly restricting observed improvements.
Conclusions:
- The clinical effectiveness of the palliative care educational intervention was not dependent on the implementation method used.
- Both teleconference and in-person training modalities appear to be viable options for disseminating palliative care education.
- Further research may be needed to explore strategies for enhancing the impact of interventions in settings with high baseline quality.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
