Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence
Akeno Tamaoki1, Takashi Kojima1,2, Asato Hasegawa1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Introduction:
It has been reported that even using the swept-source (SS) optical coherence biometer, it is challenging to measure the axial length (AL) in cases with advanced cataracts. The enhanced retina visualization (ERV) mode, which is equipped with OCTB1 (ARGOS), shifts the peak of measurement sensitivity to the retinal side so that the AL can be measured even if the light energy is attenuated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the ERV mode in measuring the AL of dense cataracts.
Methods:
This was a single-center retrospective observational case series conducted in Japan. We included 213 eyes of 213 consecutive patients with advanced cataracts who underwent preoperative evaluation. The AL was measured before and after surgery using two SS optical coherence tomography biometers (OCTB1 and OCTB2; IOLMaster 700). Cases in which OCTB1 the standard mode failed to measure AL, OCTB1 with the ERV mode was used instead. Primary outcome measures were the acquisition rate and the AL measurement accuracy using the ERV mode. The χ2 test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the acquisition rate and differences between pre- and postoperative AL values, respectively. In the ERV subgroup, Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the pre- and postoperative AL values measured using OCTB1-ERV mode. A p-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant.
Results:
The AL acquisition rate was not significantly different between OCTB1 with the standard mode and OCTB2. The AL of 65 eyes (30.5%) could not be measured using OCTB1 with the standard mode. Conversely, the AL of 51 of these eyes (78.5%) was successfully measured using OCTB1 with the ERV mode. In these 51 eyes, a difference of ≤0.2 mm and of ≤0.1 mm between pre- and postoperative AL measurements was observed in 40 (78.4%) and 30 eyes (58.8%), respectively. The Bland-Altman plot found no systematic error between pre- and postoperative AL values measured using the ERV mode.
Conclusion:
In patients with dense cataracts, AL measurement using the standard mode of an SS-OCT biometer is challenging. Furthermore, the ERV mode could be promising for AL measurement in such cases.
