Improving Limb Salvage for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis

Anna E Cyrek1, Nora Henn1, Fabian Meinhardt1

  • 1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, 39081University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Insights

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers a viable treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients ineligible for surgery. This therapy improves limb salvage, ulcer healing, and pain relief, particularly in Fontaine stage III patients.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neuromodulation
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD).
  • A significant portion of CLTI patients are unsuitable for conventional revascularization procedures.
  • Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is explored to enhance microcirculation and alleviate ischemic pain in CLTI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of SCS in CLTI patients ineligible for standard treatments.
  • Evaluate limb salvage rates, ulcer healing, and overall clinical improvements at 1-year follow-up.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 29 CLTI patients (Fontaine stage III-IV) receiving SCS.
  • Exclusion criteria included suitability for bypass surgery or endovascular intervention.
  • Outcomes measured: limb survival, ulcer closure, pain intensity (VAS), quality of life (WHOQoL-BREF), and ankle-brachial index (ABI).

Main Results:

  • 97% limb survival at 1-year (28/29 patients).
  • 73% complete ulcer closure (11/15 patients).
  • Significant improvements in pain, skin temperature, and quality of life up to 12 months post-SCS; Fontaine stage III showed greater improvement than stage IV. No impact on ABI. No device-related complications.

Conclusions:

  • SCS presents a valuable alternative for CLTI patients not amenable to revascularization.
  • Patient selection and follow-up frequency are critical for optimal outcomes.
  • Fontaine stage III patients may experience more substantial benefits from SCS therapy.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos