Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Structured Decision Making to Meet a National Water Quality Mandate
David M Martin1, Amy N Piscopo1, Marnita M Chintala1
1National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.
None:
Water quality criteria are necessary to ensure protection of ecological and human health conditions, but compliance can require complex decisions. We use structured decision making to consider multiple stakeholder objectives in a water quality management process, with a case study in the Three Bays watershed on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. We set a goal to meet or exceed a nitrogen load reduction target for the watershed and four key objectives: minimizing economic costs of implementing management actions, minimizing the complexity of permitting management actions, maximizing stakeholder acceptability of the management actions, and maximizing the provision of ecosystem services (recreational opportunity, erosion and flood control, socio-cultural amenity). We used multi-objective optimization and sensitivity analysis to generate many possible solutions that implement different combinations of nitrogen-removing management actions and reflect tradeoffs between the objectives. Results show that technological advances in controlling household nitrogen sources could provide lower cost solutions and positive impacts to ecosystem services. Although this approach is demonstrated with Cape Cod data, the decision-making process is not specific to any watershed and could be easily applied elsewhere.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Quality of Water
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Ethical Dilemmas II

