Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary
Maryam Shakiba1,2, Arsalan Salari1, Fardin Mirbolouk1
1Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Insights
No-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is predicted by older age, hypertension, diabetes, low blood pressure, cardiovascular history, heart failure, low initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, and anemia. Stenting was associated with reduced no-reflow risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Myocardial Infarction Management
Background:
- No-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
- Identifying predictors of no-reflow is crucial for improving patient outcomes and guiding therapeutic strategies.
- This study investigates clinical, laboratory, and procedural factors associated with no-reflow in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI.
- To stratify risk and inform management strategies for patients at high risk of no-reflow.
- To analyze the association between various patient characteristics and procedural factors with the occurrence of no-reflow.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 378 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI between 2015 and 2017 was studied.
- Patients were categorized into no-reflow and reflow groups based on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow and myocardial blush grades.
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine independent predictors of no-reflow.
Main Results:
- The no-reflow phenomenon occurred in 77 patients (20.4%).
- Significant independent predictors of no-reflow included older age (>60 years), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, low systolic blood pressure, history of cardiovascular diseases, chronic heart failure, low initial TIMI flow grade, and anemia.
- Stenting, compared to balloon angioplasty, was associated with a reduced risk of no-reflow (OR=0.42).
Conclusions:
- Several clinical (age, hypertension, diabetes, low BP, CVD history, CHF), laboratory (anemia), and procedural (low TIMI flow) factors independently predict no-reflow in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.
- These findings aid in identifying high-risk individuals for targeted management.
- The study highlights the importance of considering these predictors to mitigate the risk of no-reflow and improve outcomes.
Abstract:
Background: No-reflow is a major challenging issue in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aimed to investigate the clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow. Methods: This study was conducted on 378 patients with STEMI admitted to Dr. Heshmat Educational and Remedial Center (a referral heart hospital in Rasht, Iran) between 2015 and 2017. The study population was divided based on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and the myocardial blush grade into no-reflow and reflow groups. The clinical, laboratory, and procedural characteristics at admission were compared between the 2 groups using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 58.57±11.49 years, and men comprised 74.1% of the study population. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 77 patients. The no-reflow group was significantly older and more likely to be female; additionally, it had higher frequencies of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cardiovascular diseases. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age >60 years (OR=1.05, 95% CI:1.00-1.09), hypertension (OR=2.91, 95% CI:1.35-6.27), diabetes (OR=4.18, 95% CI:1.89-9.22), a low systolic blood pressure (OR=3.53, 95% CI:1.02-12.2), a history of cardiovascular diseases (OR=4.29, 95% CI:1.88-9.77), chronic heart failure (OR=4.96, 95% CI:1.23-20), a low initial TIMI flow grade (OR=7.58, 95% CI:1.46-39.2 ), anemia (OR=3.42, 95% CI:1.33-8.77), and stenting vs. balloon angioplasty (OR=0.42, 95% CI:0.19-0.91) were the significant independent predictors of no-reflow. Conclusion: This study revealed some clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow for the prediction of high-risk patients and their appropriate management to reduce the risk of no-reflow.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

