Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The overall role of a proficiency testing program.

J H Rippey1, W E Williamson

  • 1Surveys Committee, College of American Pathologists, Skokie, Ill.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Workgroup #1: Standardization of PSA.

Cancer·1993
Same author

Surveys: more than stargazing.

CAP today·1987
Same author

Quality assurance and proficiency testing for autoantibodies to nuclear antigen.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1985
Same author

Problems in ANA test interpretation: a comparison of two substrates.

Diagnostic immunology·1985
Same author

Pretest temperature effects on CAP syphilis serology survey samples.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1985
Same author

Pregnancy tests: evaluation of current status.

Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences·1984
Same journal

Assessing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights From Clinical Practice Into Scoring Criteria, Histologic Subtypes, and Genomic Characteristics Across Disease Sites.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Cross-Reactivity of TPIT Antibody Clone OTI2G1 in Chordoma: Structural Mechanisms and Diagnostic Implications.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Paracoccidioidomycosis at Autopsy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Cytology Diagnosis for Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment by the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Slide Program.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Guidance Conflict: A Call to Harmonize.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Proficiency testing programs are crucial for laboratory quality control, self-improvement, and meeting regulatory needs. However, they should not be the only measure of performance, and poor results require further investigation and corrective actions.

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory Science
  • Quality Management
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Proficiency testing (PT) is a key component of laboratory quality assurance.
  • These programs offer benefits including self-improvement, continuing education, and regulatory compliance.
  • PT is essential for maintaining high standards in laboratory performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the multifaceted benefits of proficiency testing programs for laboratories.
  • To emphasize the role of PT in total quality control and regulatory fulfillment.
  • To underscore the importance of PT as a tool for continuous improvement and education.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract discusses the conceptual framework and benefits of PT programs.
  • It emphasizes the need for broad-based, scientifically current, and unbiased PT.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The importance of integrating PT with accreditation and regulatory oversight is highlighted.

    • Main Results:

    • Proficiency testing programs offer significant advantages for participant laboratories.
    • These programs contribute to overall quality control and professional development.
    • Unsatisfactory PT results necessitate further investigation and corrective actions.

    Conclusions:

    • Proficiency testing is an indispensable element of laboratory quality management.
    • Programs must remain scientifically relevant and free from commercial bias.
    • Effective collaboration between PT providers, accreditation bodies, and regulatory agencies is vital.