Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
Published on: April 21, 2023
Public Insurance Status Negatively Affects Access to Care in Pediatric Patients With Meniscal Injury
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Insights
Publicly insured children with meniscal injuries experienced significant delays in care compared to privately insured children. These delays did not affect tear severity but highlight access to care disparities.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Non- and underinsured populations face challenges accessing timely medical care.
- Meniscal injuries are common in children and require prompt surgical intervention.
- Delayed treatment for pediatric meniscal tears can lead to worsening injuries and complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of insurance status on healthcare access for pediatric meniscal injuries.
- To determine if insurance status influences the severity of meniscal tears in children.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 49 pediatric patients with meniscal injuries treated between 2016-2018.
- Patients were stratified by public versus private insurance within a safety-net system.
- Access to care measured by wait times; injury severity assessed arthroscopically.
Main Results:
- Publicly insured patients had significantly longer wait times for surgery (347 vs. 117 days).
- Extended delays were observed for publicly insured patients across most care points (e.g., injury to MRI, clinic to surgery).
- Neither wait time nor insurance status correlated with increased tear severity or cartilage damage.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric patients with public insurance face substantial delays in diagnosis and treatment for meniscal tears.
- Despite delays, tear severity and cartilage injury were not significantly different between groups.
- Healthcare providers must address insurance-related socioeconomic factors to ensure timely care and mitigate long-term effects.
Background:
Non- and underinsured individuals experience poor access to care and treatment delays. Meniscal injury is a common reason for surgical intervention in the pediatric population, and delays in care can lead to progression of the tear and other associated problems.
Purpose:
To investigate the impact of insurance status on access to care and severity of meniscal injury in the pediatric population.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Enrolled in this study were 49 patients receiving care for a meniscal injury between 2016 and 2018 from a safety-net medical system that does not prioritize patients based on insurance status. The patients were stratified into those publicly insured and those privately insured. Access to care was measured as wait time to various points of care: initial injury to clinic, injury to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), injury to surgery, clinic to MRI, clinic to surgery, and MRI to surgery. The severity of the meniscal tear was measured by findings at the time of arthroscopy, including the type of tear identified, surgery performed, and cartilage injury.
Results:
Publicly insured patients waited a mean 230 days longer (347 vs 117 days; P < .01) to undergo surgery after injury compared with privately insured patients. The mean wait times in all categories except time from MRI to surgery were significantly longer for publicly insured patients, including injury to clinic (212 vs 73 days; P < .01), injury to MRI (260 vs 28 days; P < .001), injury to surgery (347 vs 117 days; P < .01), clinic to MRI (36 vs 3.9 days; P < .001), and clinic to surgery (136 vs 44 days; P < .01). Neither increased wait times nor insurance status were associated with greater surgical repair rate, severe tear type, or cartilage injury.
Conclusion:
Publicly insured pediatric patients waited significantly longer for a diagnosis of meniscal tear compared with privately insured patients, even in a safety-net setting. These delays were not associated with greater tear severity or cartilage changes. Providers in all models of care should recognize that insurance status and the socioeconomic factors it represents prevent publicly insured patients from timely diagnostic points of care and strive to minimize the resulting delayed return to normal activity as well as the potential long-term clinical effects thereof.
More Related Videos
06:27Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023
14:49Clinical Protocol of Producing Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Potential Cartilage Regeneration
Published on: September 29, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Healthcare System
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Standards of Care I