Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: October 28, 2022
Deep learning models for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension
Solam Lee1, Hyung-Chul Lee2, Yu Seong Chu3
1Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea; Department of Dermatology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Intraoperative hypotension is associated with a risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to present deep learning algorithms for real-time predictions 5, 10, and 15 min before a hypotensive event.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, deep learning algorithms were developed and validated using biosignal waveforms acquired from patient monitoring of noncardiac surgery. The classification model was a binary classifier of a hypotensive event (MAP <65 mm Hg) or a non-hypotensive event by analysing biosignal waveforms. The regression model was developed to directly estimate the MAP. The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and the mean absolute error (MAE).
Results:
In total, 3301 patients were included. For invasive models, the multichannel model with an arterial pressure waveform, electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, and capnography showed greater AUROC than the arterial-pressure-only models (AUROC15-min, 0.897 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.894-0.900] vs 0.891 [95% CI: 0.888-0.894]) and lesser MAE (MAE15-min, 7.76 mm Hg [95% CI: 7.64-7.87 mm Hg] vs 8.12 mm Hg [95% CI: 8.02-8.21 mm Hg]). For the noninvasive models, the multichannel model showed greater AUROCs than that of the photoplethysmography-only models (AUROC15-min, 0.762 [95% CI: 0.756-0.767] vs 0.694 [95% CI: 0.686-0.702]) and lesser MAEs (MAE15-min, 11.68 mm Hg [95% CI: 11.57-11.80 mm Hg] vs 12.67 [95% CI: 12.56-12.79 mm Hg]).
Conclusions:
Deep learning models can predict hypotensive events based on biosignals acquired using invasive and noninvasive patient monitoring. In addition, the model shows better performance when using combined rather than single signals.
More Related Videos
14:08Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018