Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Revisiting Nonlinear Bosentan Pharmacokinetics by Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Target Binding,
Satoshi Koyama1, Kota Toshimoto1, Wooin Lee1
1Sugiyama Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (S.K., K.T., Y.S.); College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea (W.L.); and National Institute of Informatics, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Y.A.).
Abstract:
Bosentan is a high-affinity antagonist of endothelin receptors and one of the earliest examples for target-mediated drug disposition [a type of nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PKs) caused by saturable target binding]. The previous physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling indicated that the nonlinear PKs of bosentan was explainable by considering saturable hepatic uptake. However, it remained unexamined to what extent the saturable target binding contributes to the nonlinear PKs of bosentan. Here, we developed a PBPK model incorporating saturable target binding and hepatic uptake and analyzed the clinical bosentan PK data using the cluster Gauss-Newton method (CGNM). The PBPK model without target binding fell short in capturing the bosentan concentrations below 100 nM, based on the PK profiles and the goodness-of-fit plot. Both global and local identifiability analyses (using the CGNM and Fisher information matrix, respectively) informed that the target binding parameters were identifiable only if the observations from the lowest dose (10 mg) were included. By analyzing blood PK profiles alone, the PBPK model with target binding yielded practically identifiable target binding parameters and predicted the maximum target occupancies of 0.6-0.8 at clinical bosentan doses. Our results indicate that target binding, albeit not a major contributor to the nonlinear bosentan PKs, may offer a prediction of target occupancy from blood PK profiles alone and potential guidance on achieving optimal efficacy outcomes, under the condition when the high-affinity drug target is responsible for the efficacy of interest and when the dose ranges cover varying degrees of target binding. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: By incorporating saturable target binding, our physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model predicted in vivo target occupancy of bosentan based only on the blood concentration-time profiles obtained from a wide range of doses. Our analysis highlights the potential utility of PBPK models that incorporate target binding in predicting target occupancy in vivo.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Bioavailability and Protein-Drug Binding
To quantify the extent of bioavailability, pharmacologists often use a parameter called .
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

