Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Assessments and Interventions for Spasticity in Infants With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review
Lauren Ayala1, Sarah Winter1, Rachel Byrne2
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Insights
This review found no high-quality spasticity assessments for infants with cerebral palsy. Botulinum toxin-A and shock wave therapy show limited short-term benefits, with parents preferring non-drug treatments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Spasticity is common in children with cerebral palsy, impacting motor skills and participation.
- Early identification and management are crucial for optimizing outcomes in young children.
- This review focuses on children under two years old with or at high risk for cerebral palsy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review evidence on spasticity assessments and interventions for infants with cerebral palsy.
- To integrate findings with parent preferences for management strategies.
- To identify gaps in current research and inform clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search across five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, OVID/Medline, SCOPUS, PsycINFO).
- Screening of articles using PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment with QUADAS-2, RTI, or Cochrane RoB tools.
- Online survey to gather parent preferences on spasticity assessments and interventions.
Main Results:
- Twelve articles met inclusion criteria; no high-quality assessment tools were identified for this age group.
- Six interventions were identified: botulinum toxin-A, orthotics, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, erythropoietic agents, medical cannabis, and homeopathy.
- Low-quality evidence supports botulinum toxin-A and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for short-term spasticity reduction. Parents highly value assessments and prefer non-pharmacological interventions.
Conclusions:
- Further research is essential to develop and validate reliable spasticity assessment tools for children under two years old.
- Conditional recommendations are made for botulinum toxin-A and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy due to limited evidence.
- Parental preferences highlight the importance of non-pharmacological approaches in managing spasticity in early childhood cerebral palsy.
Background:
The majority of children with cerebral palsy develop spasticity, which interferes with motor development, function, and participation. This systematic review appraised current evidence regarding assessments and interventions for spasticity in children aged less than two years with or at high risk for cerebral palsy and integrated findings with parent preferences.
Methods:
Five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, OVID/Medline, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO) were searched. Included articles were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Quality of the evidence was reviewed by two independent reviewers using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, second edition (QUADAS-2), the RTI Item Bank on Risk of Bias and Precision of Observational Studies (RTI), or The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB). An online survey was conducted regarding parent preferences through social media channels.
Results:
Twelve articles met inclusion criteria. No high-quality assessment tool emerged for this population. Six interventions (botulinum toxin-A, orthotic use, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, erythropoietic stimulating agents, medical cannabis, and homeopathy) were identified. There was low-quality evidence for the use of botulinum toxin-A and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy to improve short-term outcomes. Survey respondents indicated that spasticity assessments and interventions are highly valued, with nonpharmacologic interventions ranked most preferably.
Conclusions:
Further research is needed to validate assessments for spasticity in children younger than two years. Conditional recommendations can be made for botulinum toxin-A and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy based on low level of evidence to reduce spasticity in children aged less than two years.

