Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

512
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
512
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

827
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
827
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

251
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
251
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

403
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
403
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

337
Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
337
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

236
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
236

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Health Requires Public Health Leadership.

American journal of public health·2026
Same author

The association between naloxone distribution, buprenorphine treatment and retention and incident high-risk opioid prescribing with opioid overdose death in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York and Ohio, United States: An exploratory community-level cohort study of data from the HEALing Communities Study.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Statins and survival free of incident frailty among older US veterans.

European heart journal·2026
Same author

Gabapentin to achieve HIV viral load suppression in people with risky drinking in Mbarara, Uganda: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (GRAIL).

Trials·2026
Same author

COVID-19 pandemic-related stress and substance use behaviors among people with HIV - a mixed method analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Pulmonary rehabilitation is associated with increased 1-year survival in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy
07:02

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

6.7K

Revisiting methods for modeling longitudinal and survival data: Framingham Heart Study.

Julius S Ngwa1,2, Howard J Cabral3, Debbie M Cheng3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts Ave, CT 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. jngwa1@jhu.edu.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|February 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Joint models and the two-step approach offer improved estimates for longitudinal and survival data compared to traditional methods, especially when accounting for variability. These statistical models are crucial for accurate predictions in medical research.

Keywords:
Cox modelJoint longitudinal and survival modelMixed effect modelingResidual varianceTime dependent covariate modelsTwo-step approachWeibull distribution

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

396

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy
07:02

Monitoring Neuronal Survival via Longitudinal Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: January 19, 2019

6.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.5K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

396

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Longitudinal and time-to-event data are increasingly vital in medical research for monitoring disease progression and predicting survival.
  • Challenges include missing data at failure times, measurement errors, and potential bias when directly incorporating raw longitudinal measures into time-dependent survival models.
  • Traditional approaches often analyze longitudinal and survival data separately, using mixed-effects models and survival models, respectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare statistical methods linking longitudinal data to survival data for predicting survival.
  • To evaluate joint maximum likelihood methods, a two-step approach, and a time-dependent covariate method.
  • To assess the performance of Bayesian semi-parametric and maximum likelihood joint methods against the Two-Step and Time Dependent Covariate models.

Main Methods:

  • Applied Bayesian semi-parametric and maximum likelihood joint methods to maximize the joint likelihood of time-to-event and longitudinal measures.
  • Implemented the Two-Step approach, estimating random effects separately.
  • Utilized a classic Time Dependent Covariate Model and conducted simulation studies to assess bias, accuracy, and coverage probabilities of the link parameter.

Main Results:

  • The Two-Step approach showed best link parameter estimation with low longitudinal variability but exhibited downward bias with high variability.
  • Joint methods (Bayesian and maximum likelihood) provided higher link parameter estimates across both low and high variability scenarios.
  • The Time Dependent Covariate method consistently underestimated the link parameter.

Conclusions:

  • Traditional methods like the time-dependent covariate method can yield downwardly biased estimates when using observed longitudinal data.
  • The two-step approach and joint models offer improved estimation accuracy for linking longitudinal measures to survival outcomes.
  • The optimal method comparison may depend on the underlying residual variance of the longitudinal data.