Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of intermaxillary fixation (IMF) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in maxillofacial fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Bridging access, training, and robotic surgery technology: lessons from the 2025 SRS LATAM session.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Reply to Alexander Light, Max Peters, Manit Arya, et al's Salvage Focal Therapy vs Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2026;12:364-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.6448.

European urology·2026
Same author

The need for a dedicated surgical consent framework for robotic telesurgery: a global call to action.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Adverse pathology and low tumor volume in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: Toward safe expansion of active surveillance and focal therapy.

Urologic oncology·2026
Same author

Aquablation for dual burden disease - BPH and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a single-center prospective pilot study.

BMC urology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

8.4K

Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives.

Anup Kumar1, Vipul R Patel2, Sridhar Panaiyadiyan3

  • 1Department of Urology,Robotics and Renal Transplant, Vardhman Mahaveer Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Asian Journal of Urology
|February 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP) offers oncological and functional benefits for prostate cancer. Patient-tailored approaches are crucial for optimizing outcomes, considering individual anatomy and surgeon expertise.

Keywords:
Nerve-sparingProstatectomyRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy

More Related Videos

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

17.0K
Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

373

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

8.4K
Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

17.0K
Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

373

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Robotic Surgery
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standard treatment for organ-confined prostate cancer.
  • Incorporating nerve-sparing (NS) techniques into RARP improves functional outcomes alongside oncological control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current perspectives on nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP).
  • To analyze applied anatomy, neurovascular bundle preservation, surgical techniques, and functional outcomes.
  • To evaluate potency outcomes using expert panel analysis and literature review.

Main Methods:

  • Non-systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases.
  • Keywords: prostate cancer, robotic radical prostatectomy, nerve-sparing.
  • Delphi method employed with an expert panel of urology robotic surgeons to assess potency outcomes.

Main Results:

  • NS-RARP encompasses diverse techniques and approaches.
  • Lack of randomized studies prevents definitive conclusions on technique superiority.
  • Preoperative assessments, baseline potency, patient anatomy, and surgeon expertise significantly influence outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • A personalized, tailored approach is essential for successful nerve-sparing during RARP.
  • Optimizing functional outcomes in NS-RARP requires careful consideration of multiple patient- and surgeon-specific factors.