Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Postapproval Comparative Safety Study of Tofacitinib and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 5-Year
Joel M Kremer1, Clifton O Bingham2, Laura C Cappelli2
1Albany Medical College, Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York.
Objective:
Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared 5-year adverse event (AE) incidence rates (IRs) between patients initiating tofacitinib and those initiating new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) within the United States (US) Corrona RA registry.
Methods:
IRs (number of first events/100 patient-years) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious infection events (SIEs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies, and death were estimated among tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators, regardless of dose/schedule, between November 6, 2012 (US Food and Drug Administration tofacitinib approval), and July 31, 2018 (follow-up through January 31, 2019). Propensity score (PS) methods were used to control for nonrandom prescribing practices. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare rates using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Different risk windows were used for acute (MACE, SIEs, HZ, and venous thromboembolic events [VTEs]) and long-term (malignancy and death) events. VTEs were assessed descriptively.
Results:
For MACE, SIEs, and HZ, 1999 (3152.1 patient-years) and 8358 (12 869.4 years) tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators were included, respectively; for malignancy/death, 1999 (4505.6 patient-years) and 6354 (16 670.8 patient-years) initiators were included, respectively. AE rates were similar across cohorts, except for HZ, which was significantly higher with tofacitinib versus bDMARDs (PS-trimmed adjusted HR 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-3.75). There were 45 (zero serious) and 88 (five serious) HZ events with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results. VTE IRs (95% CI) were 0.29 (0.13-0.54) and 0.33 (0.24-0.45) for tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively.
Conclusion:
In this registry analysis, both cohorts had similar MACE, SIE, malignancy, death, and VTE rates; HZ rates were higher for tofacitinib initaitors than for bDMARD initiators.
Insights
Tofacitinib and biologic DMARDs showed similar rates for major adverse cardiovascular events, serious infections, malignancies, and death in rheumatoid arthritis patients. However, herpes zoster events were significantly higher with tofacitinib.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Comparative safety data for tofacitinib versus biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in real-world RA populations are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 5-year incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) between patients initiating tofacitinib and new bDMARDs in the US Corrona RA registry.
- To assess the safety profiles of tofacitinib and bDMARDs concerning major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious infections (SIEs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies, and death.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the US Corrona RA registry from November 2012 to July 2019.
- Propensity score methods were employed to balance baseline characteristics between tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators.
- Incidence rates (IRs) and Hazard Ratios (HRs) were calculated for various AEs using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression.
Main Results:
- AE rates were comparable between tofacitinib and bDMARD cohorts, with the exception of herpes zoster (HZ).
- HZ incidence was significantly higher in the tofacitinib group compared to the bDMARD group (PS-trimmed adjusted HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.43-3.75).
- Rates for MACE, SIEs, malignancies, death, and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were similar across both treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- In this US registry analysis, tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators exhibited similar rates of MACE, SIEs, malignancies, death, and VTEs.
- A higher incidence of HZ was observed in patients initiating tofacitinib compared to those initiating bDMARDs.
- These findings contribute to understanding the comparative safety of tofacitinib in RA management.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

