Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Calculation of Stopping-Power Ratio from Multiple CT Numbers Using Photon-Counting CT System: Two- and
Sung Hyun Lee1, Naoki Sunaguchi2, Akie Nagao3
1Heavy Ion Beam Medical Physics and Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan.
A new three-parameter-fitting method (three-PFM) improves stopping-power ratio (SPR) calculations in multi-spectral computed tomography (CT). This advanced method offers greater accuracy and noise resilience compared to the traditional two-PFM for various materials.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiological Imaging
- Computational Science
Background:
- The two-parameter-fitting method (PFM) is standard for calculating stopping-power ratios (SPR), crucial for radiation dosimetry.
- Accurate SPR determination is essential in medical imaging, particularly in computed tomography (CT) for dose estimation and material characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a novel three-parameter-fitting method (three-PFM) for SPR calculation in multi-spectral CT.
- To compare the accuracy and noise robustness of the three-PFM against the conventional two-PFM using photon-counting CT data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a photon-counting CT system with various material phantoms (aluminium, graphite, PMMA, biological) at 150 kVp.
- Developed a semi-empirical correction for CT values and applied both two- and three-PFMs to derive effective atomic number, electron density, and mean excitation energy.
- Simulated CT noise to assess the robustness of both fitting methods.
Main Results:
- The three-PFM demonstrated significantly lower maximum relative errors in SPR calculations compared to the two-PFM across all tested materials.
- For aluminium and graphite, maximum relative errors were 7.1% (three-PFM) vs. 17.1% (two-PFM).
- For PMMA and biological materials, maximum relative errors were 2.0% (three-PFM) vs. 5.5% (two-PFM).
Conclusions:
- The three-PFM provides more accurate SPR values, closely matching theoretical predictions.
- The three-PFM exhibits superior robustness against noise in CT data compared to the two-PFM.
- The proposed three-PFM formalism is a promising advancement for quantitative multi-spectral CT applications.
More Related Videos
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021