Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Predictive ability of postnatal growth failure for adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants: an
Sreekanth Viswanathan1, Erika Osborn2,3, Sudarshan Jadcherla2,3
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Nemours Children's Hospital, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
Insights
Defining postnatal growth failure (PGF) in preterm infants using different growth charts shows limited predictive ability for adverse feeding outcomes. This study compared Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21st charts to find the best PGF definition for predicting feeding issues.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Growth Monitoring
- Nutritional Pediatrics
Background:
- Postnatal growth failure (PGF) affects preterm infant outcomes.
- PGF rates differ based on definition and growth chart used.
- Fenton-2013 charts track intrauterine growth, while INTERGROWTH-21st monitors extrauterine preterm growth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the definition of PGF at first oral feeding that best predicts adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants.
- To compare the predictive performance of PGF definitions using Fenton-2013 and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed prospectively collected data of preterm infants (24-32 weeks gestation).
- Compared anthropometric data (weight, length, head circumference) at first oral feed using Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21st charts.
- Defined PGF using percentile (<10th) or Z-score change (≥-1.5 or ≥-2.0) and assessed prediction of adverse feeding outcomes (e.g., time to full feeds, length of stay).
Main Results:
- Both growth charts showed similar incidences of appropriate, small, and large for gestational age at birth.
- Fenton chart showed a significantly higher Z-score change of -1.5 for weight at first oral feed compared to INTERGROWTH-21st.
- Combined PGF definitions using both charts had moderate sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity and positive predictive value for adverse feeding outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Current definitions of PGF at first oral feeding offer only small to moderate predictive ability for adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants.
- Further research is needed to develop more accurate predictors of feeding outcomes in this population.
Background:
Postnatal growth failure (PGF) can impact the short- and long-term health outcomes in preterm infants. However, PGF rates vary according to the way it is defined and the growth chart used to monitor the postnatal growth. Fenton-2013 growth charts which suggest following intrauterine fetal growth compared to INTERGROWTH-21st, one specifically constructed for monitoring preterm extrauterine growth.
Objective:
Exploratory study to determine the PGF definition at first per oral (PO) that is most predictive of adverse oral feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants.
Methods:
Prospectively collected data of preterm infants 24-32 weeks gestation, who were started on cue-based oral feeds at ≤34 weeks gestation were reviewed. Anthropometric data at first PO (weight, length, and head circumference) were compared according to Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts. PGF was defined either as <10th percentile, Z-score change (ZSC) of ≥-1.5 from birth, or ZSC of ≥-2.0. Top-quartile (Q4) of feeding-related outcomes (days from first PO to full PO, post-menstrual age at full PO, days from first PO to discharge, and length of hospital stay) was considered as adverse outcome.
Results:
Of the 125 infants included, the median birth gestation and weight were 29.4 weeks and 1235 g, respectively. Incidence of appropriate, small, and large for gestational age was similar at birth by both growth charts. ZSC -1.5 for weight by Fenton was significantly higher at first PO vs. INTERGROWTH-21st (p=.02), while percentile <10th and ZSC -2.0 rates were similar. The PGF definition based on individual anthropometrics at first PO that has the best area under the curve (AUC) for adverse feeding-related outcomes was used to create a combined PGF definition for each growth chart. The AUC for the combined PGF for the Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21st was similar (p>.05) and both have moderate sensitivity and negative predictive value, but have low specificity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio for adverse feeding-related outcomes.
Conclusions:
The tested definitions of PGF at first PO have only small to moderate predictive ability for adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Teratogenicity
Growth versus Fixed Mindset
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns

