Selective loss of microvesicles is a major issue of the differential centrifugation isolation protocols

Annamaria Nigro1, Annamaria Finardi1, Marzia M Ferraro2

  • 1Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.

Scientific Reports
|February 12, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Optimizing differential centrifugation for microvesicles (MVs) isolation is crucial. This study reveals that using specific rotors and adding a washing step significantly improves MV yield and prevents subpopulation loss, enhancing biomarker research.

Area of Science:

  • Extracellular Vesicle Research
  • Cell Biology
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Microvesicles (MVs) are key players in physiological and pathological processes, serving as potential disease biomarkers.
  • Their heterogeneity and lack of specific markers complicate isolation, making differential centrifugation the standard method.
  • Current protocols often lead to significant, underestimated loss of MVs and specific subpopulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of differential centrifugation for isolating microvesicles (MVs) from cell-conditioned media.
  • To identify and address the limitations of differential centrifugation in MV isolation.
  • To propose optimized procedures for improved MV yield and purity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of microvesicle isolation using differential centrifugation via flow cytometry.
  • Characterization of isolated microvesicles using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
  • Comparison of fixed-angle versus swinging-bucket rotors and assessment of an additional washing step.

Main Results:

  • Differential centrifugation protocols result in significant and underestimated loss of MVs, including specific subpopulations.
  • The choice of rotor type (fixed-angle vs. swinging-bucket) impacts MV recovery.
  • Implementing an additional washing step during the initial low-speed centrifugation significantly increases total MV yield and prevents selective loss of subpopulations.

Conclusions:

  • Standard differential centrifugation protocols for microvesicle isolation are suboptimal due to MV loss.
  • Optimized protocols employing specific rotor types and an additional washing step are essential for high-quantity, high-quality MV isolation.
  • These improved methods are critical for reliable downstream analysis and applications of microvesicles as biomarkers.