Circulating multimarker approach to identify patients with preclinical left ventricular remodelling and/or diastolic dysfunction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Olivier Huttin1,2, Masatake Kobayashi1, João Pedro Ferreira1
1Université de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique, Inserm1433, CHRU Nancy, Inserm DCAC, and F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), INSERM CHU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, 4 Rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre lès, Nancy, France.
Insights
A multimarker approach using fibrosis and inflammation biomarkers moderately improved the prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction (DD) in a large population. While significant, the added predictive value in unselected individuals is marginal, suggesting further research for personalized screening.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
- Population Health
Background:
- Myocardial fibrosis and inflammation biomarkers are linked to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction (DD).
- The combined predictive value of these biomarkers for LVH and DD in population studies remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the added value of a multimarker strategy (BNP, Galectin-3, P3NP, ST2) in detecting LVH and DD within a large population-based cohort.
- To evaluate the predictive performance of these biomarkers using discrimination and reclassification analyses.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the STANISLAS cohort (1705 subjects).
- Evaluation of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), Galectin-3 (GAL3), N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III (P3NP), and soluble ST2.
- Utilized discrimination (C-index) and reclassification (NRI) to assess predictive ability for LVH and DD.
Main Results:
- Subjects with LVH and/or DD showed elevated BNP, GAL3, and ST2 levels.
- The addition of the four biomarkers significantly improved the prediction of LVH (delta C-index = 0.03) and DD (delta C-index = 0.01) over clinical variables.
- Gal3, P3NP, and ST2 notably enhanced DD prediction (NRI = 31.3) beyond clinical factors and BNP.
Conclusions:
- A multimarker approach offers a moderate but significant improvement in predicting LVH and DD in population studies.
- The incremental predictive gain from Gal3, P3NP, and ST2 for preclinical DD in unselected individuals is marginal.
- Further research into personalized medicine approaches combining proteomic and clinical data is warranted to enhance the detection of preclinical DD.
Aims:
Biomarkers reflecting myocardial fibrosis and inflammation have been individually associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction (DD). However, the added value of a fibrosis-inflammation multimarker approach in a populational setting is yet to be studied. We evaluated the value of a multimarker approach to detect LVH and DD in a large population-based cohort.
Methods And Results:
In a prespecified analysis (BioSe-PreIC study) of the 4th visit of the STANISLAS cohort (1705 subjects, 47 ± 14 years, 47.4% men), we evaluated the ability of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), Galectin-3 (GAL3), N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III (P3NP), and soluble ST2 to predict LVH (LV mass > 116/100 g/m2 for men/women) and DD using discrimination (C-index) and reclassification analysis (NRI). Participants with LVH and/or DD had significantly higher levels of BNP, GAL3, and ST2. Overall, the predictive value of clinical variables for LVH and/or DD was good (C-index ranging from 0.76 to 0.82) and the addition of BNP, Gal3, P3NP, and ST2 moderately but significantly improved predictive value (delta C-index = 0.03, P = 0.03 for LVH and 0.01, P = 0.01 for DD) and reclassification (NRI = 25.3, P = 0.02 for LVH and NRI = 32.7 for DD, P < 0.0001). Gal3, P3NP, and ST2 significantly improved predictive value (delta C-index = 0.01, P = 0.01) and reclassification (NRI = 31.3, P < 0.0001) for DD of top of clinical variables and BNP.
Conclusions:
As the measurement of Gal3, P3NP, and ST2 results in marginal (even if significant) increase in the prediction of DD/LVH on top of routine evaluation, their systematic use should not be promoted in unselected healthy individuals to screen for preclinical DD. Further research is needed to determine whether a more personalized medicine approach combing proteomic and clinical scoring can amplify the added value of biomarkers to identify preclinical DD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

