Pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: a retrospective study to propose the diagnostic tests algorithm in southern Iran

Zahra Rezaei1, Bahman Pourabbas2, Sadaf Asaei1

  • 1Professor Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand st., Shiraz, Iran.

Parasitology Research
|February 12, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Accurate diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in children is crucial. Combining quantitative PCR (qPCR) with serological tests like IFAT or rK39-RDT improves detection rates for VL.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pediatric Diagnostics

Background:

  • Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by Leishmania infantum, is a significant health concern in Iran, particularly affecting young children.
  • Accurate, timely, and minimally invasive diagnostic methods are essential for effective VL management in pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative PCR (qPCR), indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), and rK39-rapid diagnostic test (rK39-RDT) for VL detection in children.
  • To identify an optimal diagnostic algorithm for VL in children, balancing invasiveness and diagnostic robustness.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study involving 415 children with suspected VL, 50 healthy children from endemic areas, 46 healthy individuals from non-endemic areas, and 47 patients with non-VL diseases.
  • Diagnostic testing included qPCR, IFAT, and rK39-RDT.
  • Performance metrics such as sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test and for combined approaches.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) demonstrated the highest sensitivity (92.2%), followed by IFAT (82.4%) and rK39-RDT (77.5%).
  • qPCR and IFAT showed 100% specificity, while rK39-RDT had 98.6% specificity.
  • Combining qPCR with either IFAT or rK39-RDT achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 98% for VL.
  • A combination of rK39-RDT and IFAT offered a sensitivity of 93.1%, comparable to qPCR alone, for laboratories lacking molecular facilities.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for VL in children.
  • Integrating serological tests (IFAT, rK39-RDT) with qPCR enhances overall VL detection rates.
  • For resource-limited settings, a combination of IFAT and rK39-RDT provides a viable alternative for sensitive VL diagnosis in children.