Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in pediatric traumatic brain injury

Inge A van Erp1,2,3, Apostolos Gaitanidis1, Mohamad El Moheb1

  • 11Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Insights

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) appears more effective than unfractionated heparin (UH) for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Further research is needed to confirm LMWH superiority in this population.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Pediatric Critical Care
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence is rising in pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.
  • Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis in pediatric TBI, but evidence is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of LMWH versus unfractionated heparin (UH) in preventing VTE in pediatric TBI patients.
  • To evaluate VTE, mortality, and craniotomy rates between LMWH and UH prophylaxis groups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2017).
  • Inclusion of pediatric patients (≤18 years) with TBI requiring VTE prophylaxis.
  • Propensity score matching (PSM) to control for confounding variables.
  • Comparison of VTE, death, and craniotomy rates post-prophylaxis initiation.

Main Results:

  • A total of 2479 pediatric TBI patients were analyzed.
  • After PSM, patients receiving UH had a significantly higher incidence of VTE (5.1% vs. 2.9%, p=0.03).
  • Patients receiving UH were younger and had more severe injuries prior to matching.

Conclusions:

  • LMWH prophylaxis demonstrates greater efficacy than UH in preventing VTE among pediatric TBI patients.
  • Larger, prospective studies are necessary to validate LMWH's superiority.
  • Outcomes in very young pediatric populations require dedicated investigation.
Abstract