Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Enumeration of Major Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Populations for Multicenter Clinical Trials Using a Whole Blood Phenotyping Assay
Published on: September 16, 2012
Sub-setting systemic lupus erythematosus by combined molecular phenotypes defines divergent populations in two phase
Michelle Petri1, Steven D Watts2, Richard E Higgs2
1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Objectives:
Heterogeneity of SLE patients in clinical trials remains a challenge for developing new therapies. This study used a combinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers to define key sources of heterogeneity.
Methods:
Combinations of IFN (high/low), anti-dsDNA (+/-) and C3 and C4 (low/normal) were used to subset n = 1747 patients from two randomized phase III trials. A dichotomous classification scheme defined SLE (+) as: IFN (high), anti-dsDNA (+), C3 (low) and/or C4 (low). SLE (-) required all of the following: IFN (low), anti-dsDNA (-), C3 (normal) and C4 (normal). Additional analyses subset the data further by IFN, anti-dsDNA and complement.
Results:
The trials enrolled n = 2262 patients of which n = 1747 patients had data for IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 at baseline. There were n = 247 patients in the SLE (-) population and n = 1500 patients in the SLE (+) population. The SLE (-) population had more mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal disease at baseline, while SLE (+) had more haematological, renal and vascular involvement. There was lower concomitant medication use in the SLE (-) population for corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, except for MTX. Time to severe flare was significantly longer in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P < 0.0001) and SRI-4 response rate was significantly lower in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P = 0.00016). The USA had more SLE (-) patients (22%) than Mexico/Central America/South America (10%), Europe (7%) and the rest of the world (5%).
Conclusion:
Combinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers revealed subsets of SLE patients that discriminated by disease manifestations, concomitant medication use, geography, time to severe flare and SRI-4 response. These data may be useful for designing clinical trials and identifying subsets of patients for analysis. Rheumatology key messages SLE patients from a P3 trial were categorized by IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 status. Patients lacking molecular markers of SLE distinguished from biomarker positive patients on multiple clinical parameters. Biomarker negative patients have distinct disease characteristics that may impact clinical trial outcomes.
More Related Videos
12:04The bm12 Inducible Model of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus SLE in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: November 1, 2015
11:06Genome-wide Analysis of HDAC Inhibitor-mediated Modulation of microRNAs and mRNAs in B Cells Induced to Undergo Class-switch DNA Recombination and Plasma Cell Differentiation
Published on: September 20, 2017