Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

424
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
424
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

8.8K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
8.8K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.1K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.1K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.1K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.4K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinically Relevant Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Do Patients' Expectations Evolve Over Long-term Follow-up?

The American journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

The Effect of Previous Lumbar Spine Surgery on Primary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

The American journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Short-term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears in Underweight Patients.

The American journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Outcomes After Anatomic Labral Repair With All-Suture Knotless Tensionable Anchors in Primary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Analysis of 200 Consecutive Patients.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Midterm Outcomes in Patients After Central Acetabular Decompression for Central Acetabular Stenosis: A Comparison With a Matched Control Group.

The American journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Patient-reported Outcomes of Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty After Previous Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Case-control Study With a Minimum 5-year Follow-up.

Orthopedics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.6K

The Blight of the Type II Error: When No Difference Does Not Mean No Difference.

Benjamin G Domb1, Payam W Sabetian2

  • 1American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A..

Arthroscopy : the Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
|February 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Researchers often overlook type II errors, failing to detect real differences. This study highlights the high prevalence of type II errors and advocates for precise conclusions when statistical significance is not met.

More Related Videos

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.6K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical methodology
  • Scientific research integrity

Background:

  • Research commonly prioritizes minimizing type I errors (false positives).
  • Standard statistical methods permit a higher rate of type II errors (false negatives).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the prevalence and dangers of type II errors in scientific research.
  • To advocate for precise conclusions to prevent overreaching claims of no difference.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of statistical error rates in hypothesis testing.
  • Review of implications of failing to reject the null hypothesis.

Main Results:

  • Type II error rates can exceed 20%, significantly higher than the ≤5% rate for type I errors.
  • Overreaching conclusions based on non-significant results can impede scientific progress.

Conclusions:

  • Failure to reject the null hypothesis should be stated precisely, avoiding claims of no difference.
  • Accurate reporting of statistical findings is crucial to maintain research integrity and advance scientific understanding.