Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Multipronged Phenotyping Approaches to Characterize Sugarcane Root Systems
Published on: August 17, 2022
Strategies and considerations for implementing genomic selection to improve traits with additive and non-additive
Kai P Voss-Fels1, Xianming Wei2, Elizabeth M Ross1
1Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Key Message:
Simulations highlight the potential of genomic selection to substantially increase genetic gain for complex traits in sugarcane. The success rate depends on the trait genetic architecture and the implementation strategy. Genomic selection (GS) has the potential to increase the rate of genetic gain in sugarcane beyond the levels achieved by conventional phenotypic selection (PS). To assess different implementation strategies, we simulated two different GS-based breeding strategies and compared genetic gain and genetic variance over five breeding cycles to standard PS. GS scheme 1 followed similar routines like conventional PS but included three rapid recurrent genomic selection (RRGS) steps. GS scheme 2 also included three RRGS steps but did not include a progeny assessment stage and therefore differed more fundamentally from PS. Under an additive trait model, both simulated GS schemes achieved annual genetic gains of 2.6-2.7% which were 1.9 times higher compared to standard phenotypic selection (1.4%). For a complex non-additive trait model, the expected annual rates of genetic gain were lower for all breeding schemes; however, the rates for the GS schemes (1.5-1.6%) were still greater than PS (1.1%). Investigating cost-benefit ratios with regard to numbers of genotyped clones showed that substantial benefits could be achieved when only 1500 clones were genotyped per 10-year breeding cycle for the additive genetic model. Our results show that under a complex non-additive genetic model, the success rate of GS depends on the implementation strategy, the number of genotyped clones and the stage of the breeding program, likely reflecting how changes in QTL allele frequencies change additive genetic variance and therefore the efficiency of selection. These results are encouraging and motivate further work to facilitate the adoption of GS in sugarcane breeding.
More Related Videos
09:43Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
Published on: January 3, 2025
08:27Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Transgenic Plants
The first-ever transgenic plant was a tobacco plant developed in 1983 that showed resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus. Since then, many transgenic plants have been developed and commercialized for improving the agricultural, ornamental, and horticultural value of a crop plant. Transgenic...
Incomplete Dominance