Rethinking Consent for Stroke Trials in Time-Sensitive Situations: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic

Mayank Goyal1,2, Johanna Maria Ospel1,3, Aravind Ganesh1

  • 1Department of Clinical Neurosciences (M.G., J.M.O., A.G., M.M.), University of Calgary, Canada.

Stroke
|February 16, 2021
PubMed

Insights

The COVID-19 pandemic complicated informed consent for clinical trials. This paper proposes a framework to adapt consent processes during emergencies while protecting patient autonomy.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Informed consent is crucial for patient autonomy in healthcare and research.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic created significant challenges for obtaining informed consent due to safety measures and increased healthcare demands.
  • Delays in patient consent became a major obstacle for numerous clinical trials.

Observation:

  • The pandemic necessitated a re-evaluation of traditional informed consent procedures.
  • Physical distancing and high physician workload complicated the process of ensuring adequate patient understanding and agreement.
  • Existing consent protocols faced unprecedented strain, highlighting potential limitations.

Findings:

  • Altering informed consent processes during public health crises may be acceptable under specific conditions.
  • A flexible framework with predefined criteria and safeguards is proposed.
  • This framework aims to balance the need for timely trial progression with the imperative to uphold patient autonomy.

Implications:

  • The proposed framework offers a potential solution for conducting clinical trials during future pandemics or similar emergencies.
  • It emphasizes maintaining patient autonomy even when modifying consent procedures.
  • This approach could streamline research participation while ensuring ethical standards are met.