Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Comparisons between self-reported and interview-verified psychotic-like experiences in adolescents
Meng Sun1, Dongfang Wang1,2, Ling Jing3
1Department of Social Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE-P15) scale shows poor validity for self-reported psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) alone. However, it demonstrates better accuracy when distress is considered, particularly for lifetime PLEs and bizarre experiences.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Psychological Assessment
- Mental Health Research
Background:
- The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE-P15) is frequently used to measure self-reported psychotic-like experiences (PLEs).
- The established validity of the CAPE-P15, particularly its positive subscale, requires further investigation.
- There is a need to assess the consistency between self-reported and interview-verified PLEs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency between self-reported PLEs (PLEs-S) and interview-verified PLEs (PLEs-I) using the CAPE-P15.
- To determine the validity of the CAPE-P15 in a college student population.
- To explore the diagnostic accuracy of specific CAPE-P15 items, especially concerning associated distress.
Main Methods:
- 1255 college students completed the CAPE-P15 to assess lifetime and current PLEs.
- Telephone interviews were conducted with high-risk students and a subset of others, using CAPE-P15 items and criteria for attenuated positive symptom syndrome.
- Analysis focused on correspondence rates (CRs) and kappa (κ) values to assess consistency.
Main Results:
- When considering PLEs alone, consistency between self-report and interview was below established thresholds (low κ values and CRs).
- Adequate consistency (κ = .432, CR = 90.0%) was found for lifetime PLEs when associated distress was included in self-reports.
- Bizarre experiences (BEs) demonstrated adequate diagnostic accuracy for lifetime PLEs when distress was considered. Optimal cut-off points for frequency scores were identified for lifetime and past-month PLEs.
Conclusions:
- The overall validity of the CAPE-P15 for genuine PLEs is limited, but its accuracy improves significantly when associated distress is considered.
- The scale is particularly effective for detecting lifetime PLEs when distress is factored in.
- Self-report items related to bizarre experiences may be valuable for identifying PLEs in late adolescence.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Positive Symptoms Schizophrenia: Hallucinations and Delusions
Hallucinations
Hallucinations in...
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence

