Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

221
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
221
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

374
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
374
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

264
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
264
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.7K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.7K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

85
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
85

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Transcriptional repression by TGIF2 coordinates neurogenic priming and neural stem cell maintenance.

Science advances·2026
Same author

UniversalEPI: robust prediction of cell type-specific and differential chromatin interactions from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

RegVelo: Gene-regulatory-informed dynamics of single cells.

Cell·2026
Same author

Glial multicellular programs reveal distinct patient stratification in Parkinson's disease.

Research square·2026
Same author

TarDis: Achieving robust and structured disentanglement of multiple covariates.

Cell systems·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Deep Learning-based Propensity Scores for Confounding Control in Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Large-scale,

Janick Weberpals1, Tim Becker2, Jessica Davies3

  • 1From the Data Science, Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development Informatics (pREDi), Roche Innovation Center Munich (RICM), Penzberg, Germany.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|February 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Autoencoders can compute propensity scores (PSs) for balancing prognostic factors in real-world data. While feasible, this deep learning method did not outperform established techniques like LASSO for confounding control.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Machine learning applications in healthcare research
  • Real-world data analysis and confounding control

Background:

  • Real-world data (RWD) analysis requires balancing prognostic factors due to non-randomized designs.
  • Propensity scores (PSs) are commonly used to address confounding in RWD studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of autoencoders, a type of unsupervised deep learning architecture, for computing propensity scores.
  • To evaluate the performance of autoencoder-based PS computation against established methods.

Main Methods:

  • Trained an autoencoder on patient-level data from 128,368 first-line cancer patients to learn patient representations for PS computation.
  • Conducted a simulation study to assess balancing and adjustment performance using metrics like standardized mean differences and RMSE.
  • Emulated the PRONOUNCE trial in an observational setting to illustrate the application of autoencoder-based PS.

Main Results:

  • Autoencoder-based PS, along with LASSO and other methods, achieved well-balanced cohorts (average standardized mean differences <0.1).
  • LASSO showed the lowest estimation deviation (RMSE 0.0205), closely followed by the autoencoder approach (RMSE 0.0248).
  • Sensitivity analyses indicated comparable performance between autoencoder and LASSO methods.

Conclusions:

  • Autoencoder-based PS computation is a viable method for confounding control in RWD studies.
  • The autoencoder approach demonstrated feasibility but did not surpass the performance of established methods like LASSO.