Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.9K
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

12.9K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.9K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.7K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.8K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.8K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

664
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
664
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

170
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
170

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal association of switching to dual cigarette and e-cigarette use vs. continued exclusive cigarette smoking with tobacco-specific nitrosamine and nicotine intake.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

CACE-MM: using mixed methods to strengthen causal inference in medicine and public health.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Large language models for full-text methods assessment: a case study on mediation analysis.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Impact of Animal Assisted Therapy on Quality, Completeness, and Satisfaction in Pediatric Echocardiography.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography·2026
Same author

Patient-Centered Evaluation of Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.

NEJM evidence·2026
Same author

A <i>Cautionary Tale</i> on Integrating Studies with Disparate Outcome Measures for Causal Inference.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026
Same journal

Temporal Connectivity of Social Contact Networks in Urban and Rural India.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Indoor Radon Concentrations and Hematologic Traits in the Women's Health Initiative.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Non-random selection with and without bias due to selecting on an exposure.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.1K

Generalizability of Subgroup Effects.

Marissa J Seamans1, Hwanhee Hong2, Benjamin Ackerman3

  • 1From the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|February 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Generalizability methods help infer intervention effects in target populations. This study examines how subgroup effects generalize, revealing potential biases when sample subgroup effects differ from population effects.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Generalizability methods are crucial for applying study findings to broader populations.
  • Current methods often assume subgroup-specific effects are directly transferable from sample to population.
  • Concerns exist regarding potential differences in subgroup effects between study samples and target populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the generalizability of subgroup effects in intervention studies.
  • To quantify the bias introduced when subgroup effects do not directly generalize.
  • To explore the impact of unmeasured heterogeneity on subgroup effect generalizability.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of bias in sample average treatment effect (SATE) as a population average treatment effect (PATE) estimator.
  • Monte Carlo simulation to assess bias from unmeasured heterogeneity of subgroup effects.
  • Analysis of an illustrative data example to demonstrate potential bias.

Main Results:

  • The study derives the bias in SATE when subgroup effects differ between sample and population.
  • Monte Carlo simulations illustrate the extent of bias due to unmeasured heterogeneity.
  • An example demonstrates the practical implications of biased subgroup effect generalizability.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding subgroup effect generalizability is vital for accurate external validity.
  • Failure of subgroup effects to generalize can lead to biased inferences about intervention effects.
  • This work highlights the need to consider subgroup effect heterogeneity in generalizability assessments.