Where did they not go? Considerations for generating pseudo-absences for telemetry-based habitat models
Elliott L Hazen1,2,3, Briana Abrahms4,5, Stephanie Brodie4,6
1NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Environmental Research Division, Monterey, CA, USA. Elliott.hazen@noaa.gov.
Movement Ecology
|February 18, 2021
Summary
Choosing how to generate pseudo-absences significantly impacts habitat model accuracy. Environmental niche separation between presence and pseudo-absence data is key for reliable species distribution models. Careful consideration of sampling domains is crucial for biologically realistic predictions.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Spatial Modeling
Background:
- Habitat suitability models are crucial for understanding species distributions and informing conservation efforts.
- Telemetry data is increasingly used in these models, often requiring the generation of pseudo-absences to simulate un-occupied areas.
- The method of generating pseudo-absences can significantly influence model outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different pseudo-absence generation methods affect the performance of telemetry-based habitat models.
- To explore these effects across diverse species movement strategies, modeling approaches, and environmental contexts.
Main Methods:
- Developed habitat models for blue whales and African elephants using telemetry data.
- Tested four pseudo-absence generation techniques: background sampling, buffer sampling, correlated random walks, and reverse correlated random walks.
- Employed generalized linear mixed models, generalized additive mixed models, and boosted regression trees for habitat modeling.
Main Results:
- Environmental niche space separation between presence and pseudo-absence data was the primary driver of model performance.
- The optimal pseudo-absence method varied by species (background sampling for blue whales, reverse correlated random walks for elephants).
- Models with greater environmental separation showed improved predictive skill but not always biologically realistic spatial predictions.
Conclusions:
- Habitat model performance can be positively biased if pseudo-absences are sampled from environmentally dissimilar areas.
- Careful consideration of sampling domain extent and environmental heterogeneity is vital for pseudo-absence generation.
- Scrutinizing spatial predictions is essential to ensure habitat models are biologically realistic and meet management objectives.
Related Concept Videos
Errors in Global Positioning System
196
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
196
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
245
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
245
Habitat Fragmentation
20.4K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.4K


